Skip to main content

CSMX - Post #41

Things have been quiet between the CSM and CCP. That does not mean CCP has not been up to things. The patch notes and skimming the forums have shown a lot of activity. The patch notes are live for the January 12th, 2016 release.

On January 5th, 2016 CCP Fozzie made a feedback thread about allowing logistic frigates into small FW complexes. In the three pages of response the answer, "yes" was rather unanimous. In the patch notes for January 12th, 2016 we see that logistic frigates are now allowed into small complexes. I assume that feedback and development decisions worked well in that situation. There was some comment about the lack of entry into the small complexes at release. While it did not make 'sense' for those that compared it to larger, logistics brethren, I preferred it. I prefer cautious approaches to potentially overwhelming changes and I will point to command destroyers as an example.

On the 5th, CCP Paradox was also asking for testing feedback from the test server with the changes to the 'buff bar'. I've mentioned buff bar a few times and people stare at me. We're discussing the icons over your HUD that tell you what e-war is making you happy (or unhappy). This is part of some movement CCP has made to give more visual information in the immediate in space HUD instead of having to check menus, sub-menus, and read what is doing what. The changes discussed in that thread will be going live on Tuesday as well.

The Capital Focus group has woken from its slumber. CCP Larrikin posed a question about inherent warp core strength of capitals. It gives me a side thought. Currently, infinity points are infinity points. Should this continue? I am not for or against infinity points in their current implementation. I simply feel that inherent warp core strength.

Also on the 6th (busy day) there are new camera controls on Sisi for the camera changes that are coming in. Those camera changes have not been approached with a lot of love so far. The general idea is sound but the lack of 'classic' mode has had people very unhappy in my interactions with them. Take a minute to look at the latest iteration.

There are a bunch of changes coming to CREST for those that understand them. I'm not one of those people. CCP FoxFour has put up a development blog on the developers portal. I believe these changes are heading towards less reliance on the in game browser and how tools can be made and support added to remove that reliance.

CCP Leeloo also posted the upcoming CSMXI information for those interested. I am not going to be doing analysis of candidates and hurf blurfing about the future and how I was the best CSM ever and 'my CSM was better than your CSM'. I hate that. I've talked to candidates who have wanted to talk to me. It is an interesting experience. I'm quite often told that things don't or won't work as I've discussed or won't and don't bother them or cause problems for them as they have myself. Its an odd experience and often leaves me vaguely puzzled.

What I will say for those looking to pick for the next election. The CSM does not necessarily lead to a greater love for the game. A candidate that has not been active or interested in Eve will probably not find a sudden surge of interest, time, and affection for a stressful position that offers little personal reward. A person who cannot speak to others will not develop the ability to converse calmly and thoughtfully with differing opinions and various view points. The person is being elected not their promises, their corporation, or their alliance. And with each person comes their own baggage, from life to school to work and family responsibilities. Consider more than a ticker or a promise that allies closely with a personal desire.

Anyway, I'm open to questions as always about things. I'm not thrilled about the summit in May so soon after the elections. It takes months for most people to settle and spin up into productivity as they figure out what to do. I think September was a better place. The summer just isn't since people go on vacation and its a relevantly slower period of time. And yes, I expressed my opinion on that.

We're supposed to start back up on Monday. We will see how that goes. We moved to Hipchat in November and its not been as active as Slack and Slack was not as active as Skype. With the Summit supposed to be next month its time to get my books gathered and closed. I have a stack of things that have never been gotten to.

Comments

  1. This isn't exactly a buff bar comment but it is somewhere in the same ball park. Currently, when you jump through a gate you get a wonderful little 60 second gate cloak count down timer. Has there been any discussion of adding a similar "Station Exit Invulnerability Timer"? The situations aren't exactly equivalent as your not invisible exiting stations but invulnerability, if I recall correctly, does last for 30 seconds if you don't do anything.

    ReplyDelete
  2. o/ Sugar Kyle,

    for what it's worth, happy YC 118 and the best wishes.

    I have a question concerning the CSM whitepaper.
    After Manfred Sideous public removal of the CSM X,
    the next in line was Bobmon, however CCP Games made
    an arbitrary decision by not putting him on the CSM X.
    source: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6148811

    Their reasoning was that there was not enough time for
    someone that ran for CSM seriously and has been a great
    fan event co-organizer, plus is the Chief editor for EN24.
    To properly digest the current CSM processes between
    the 1st week of Nov 2015, and the last week of April 2016.
    source: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/csm11-elections/

    My question; do you think the newly written CSM whitepaper covers a(ny) such future arbitrary decisions made by CCP games,
    in order to protect our STV votes still being applied to the CSM process during the whole CSM year ?

    Regards, a Freelancer

    PS: hindsight being 20/20, with the lull of CCP - CSM activity

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …