Skip to main content

CSMX - Post #37

It seems the week was not as calm as I thought it was. I do not watch streams and I have decided to step away from several areas of Eve media for a bit. Because of that, I've slowly acquired second hand knowledge of things that are coming.

It seems that links are headed towards being on grid. This I learned second hand from a stream that CCP Fozzie was on. I don't know what stream or when. It is not surprising news. Changes to links were always dependent on Brain in a Box. With that deployed it looks like CCP has made their decision to change links. I have no knowledge of what their plans are.

I have also seen some references to Rorqual sized mining drones. This, as far as I understand, was announced and shared at Eve Down Under. I did not know it was on the board nor do I have any further details about it. I will assume that it was during something CCP Larrikin discussed as that he is the lead on Capital changes.

CCP Fozzie has also released the Logistic Frigate stats on the forums. With that is the changes to remote repair modules, their tiericide and the fall off information. CCP Fozzie has included graphs in the forum post.

There have been some worries about Command Destroyers cropping up. We've reached out to CCP Rise and his team with questions about chaining jumps and are nullified ships exempt. Hopefully, we will hear some further details. There appears to be both excitement and apprehension in the air about their ability to move other ships and what that will do to the future of fights.

Outside of game design, the Art Team has released a dev blog discussing the future of filth. It seems we are dirty, dirty people. Your ship will get filthy being spun. Instead of looking into the fact that everyone has some quality control issues with their air scrubbers, we're going to wash the ships. I think its good we have clones because this station air must be damaging our lungs. It explains the captain quarters door?

You may see some new streams coming up on CCP's Twitch Channel. They are trying stuff out and seeing if it interests people. They've done things from playing Eve to showing concept art to baking. Poke your head in if you like to watch things and see how you do.

As is apparent, I'm woefully under informed this week as to what is going on in CCP development land. That has not escaped my notice. It is embarrassing to admit, but I'm not going to pretend I was in the know when I was not. As to what will happen? We will see. I am not overjoyed at having people ask me questions and opinions about changes I didn't know were happening. While the development teams are not obligated to the CSM our working relationship, is in my opinion, not where it should be. I'd like to believe that this disconnect will be cleared up. One way or another I'll keep you updated.

Comments

  1. So there may be very large mining drones that just the Rorqual can use? That is interesting - but I can't imagine many people, aside maybe large and active groups, which would do that in dangerous space.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I’m impressed, I must say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and informative for Eyes on the Big Acquisition in this headline, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head.

    http://www.artweddings.co.uk/bridal-accessories-uk/wedding-veils-uk/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lot of interesting stuff here but... "I have also seen some references to Rorqual sized mining drones. " er, what?? I'm not sure what's going on Down Under, cant find anything on the web about that yet… but at EVE Vegas, CCP Larrikin made some 'sure-could-be-taken-wayyy-out-of-context-when-repeated-later-stuff...

    He was asked about Rorquals in the "Capitols in the EVE Online: Citadel Expansion" presentation Q&A...

    Q:"Can you make the Rorgual have a mining laser that does that scythe thing through the asteroid belts?"
    A: (he was told by Fozzie that because the doomsday demos were in a belt, that) "...someones gonna come up and ask you for a mining doomsday now, you're that guy."

    He was asked about the Rorq in general and said they are looking at increasing the Fleet Hangar and sorta move the Rorq up to be a real Capitol... but that's all under discussion. But I have watched it several times and searched the webs high and low and found nothing about Capitol Drones...

    And on a personal note, one guy asked, on behalf of Logi Pilots... to which, after his question, I took some small offense... He asked:

    Q: "On behalf of login pilots, can we have a cooler name than Force Auxiliary?"
    to which CCP Larrikin responded...
    A: "WOW, you wound me."

    Logistics in EVE is an AUXILIARY to the Force. IE Force Auxiliary by definition. We are Fleet SUPPORT, and yes I am one, L5 Logistics Pilot and damn proud of it, but this bro did not talk on my behalf…

    We are not the ships that win the battle... put 50 Logi on grid ALONE against a DPS mixed fleet of the dame size and tell me how many enemy Sub, Cap and Supercaps will die? NONE. The Force does the killing, Login ONLY helps them. Force Auxiliary is a perfect name for the role Logi plays...

    The guy asking the question says... "We're not auxiliary, we're the thing that keep everything alive." Yeah... we are the Medics, the Corpman…. and Medics don't win fights brah, and never will... we are a valuable AUXILIARY to the fleet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Force Auxiliary is a fine name. I'd like to see the logistics skill & subcap ship types get a new name, as the word better describes a workflow process, like getting stuff from A to B.

      Delete
    2. Agree completely... I never really hooked onto 'Logistics' as the name for what we are. We are essentially Space Priests... but no self-respecting Logi pilot in EVE would accept that as an actual name... even if we do use it jokingly amongst ourselves...

      Logistics in the military sense is the art of moving and distributing supplies (ammo, fuel, food, etc.) for the force, not activities that are basically a form of healing, or medical support, for defensive systems not human beings.

      So what is a traditional name for direct intervention that mitigates and repairs damage cause by military action? In the US Navy it is the United States Naval Construction Forces (NCF) or Contraction Battalions, or CBs usually written as SeaBees. In the CB's there are 2 types of units: Amphibious Construction Battalions (ACBs) and Mobile Construction Battalions (MCBs).

      Maybe we could have a new type... Fleet Repair Battalions. FRBs... oh, wait... that would quickly become "FeRBs".. Hmm... OK, how about Fleet Repair Force, FRFs... and mebbe just call us "Reppers" for short, cause in truth, that’s what we are. =]

      Delete
    3. If I was called an FRF, I'd totally abbreviate it to Fluffs.

      Imagine a super-serious FC saying that!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …