Skip to main content

Because, Because, Because, Because, Because!

Somewhere in my pondering stuff came the question of value of that stuff. The value that stuff has to me and that value that stuff has to others and what value should it have. That is the question of accessibility vs status.

I've never played World of Warcraft. I understand, in a vague way from hearing other's discuss it that the gear you wear in World of Warcraft is super important. I know that in Diablo you are supposed to care about some high end gear that I've never cared about. Getting this gear is something that is brag worthy. In Eve it often translates into someone buying plex and making an officer fit Drake because in other games high value equipment improves you more than anything else does.

Last year I worked to get escalations redone. This improved the number of escalations which caused an uptick in modules found by exploration. This brings more modules to the market and thus their price crashes. However, there are more of them so while the individual price goes down the number the player can gain offsets that price crash.

But, along with that came complaints that finding these modules no longer felt special. That getting these modules was not so exciting. That is true but at the same time the use of the modules increases as the cost comes down to what more players consider within their expense ranges.  They become more accessible and people are willing to take a more expensive step.

So, the accessibility is increase and the status is decreased because it is more common. Common things are not exciting things because everyone has that. But the accessibility seems to be worth it to me.

Some of that comes down to the why are we playing aspect. As players play their interests and tastes change. I often come back to the killboards because there is so much focus on them. The amount of destruction that one player visits on another is the way that many define their actions in the game. Status is created by that cost and as that cost decreases the value of that kill decreases.

Are we attacking players or attacking stuff? That may be the question to look at. Are we fighting for the fight or just trying to destroy someone elses things? For those engaged in actions with such questions, they know their own answers. But, I think these questions and topics get tied up in the greater aspect of the game.

What game are we playing? Eve is a transmutable creature. It is part of the appeal. But it cannot support each style to the exclusion of others. It is very easy to get trapped inside of our own game and wrap ourselves within self imposed rules. After all, Diablo is about getting epic gear and WoW about end game raiding? So Eve is about expensive pvp kills...?

Comments

  1. Eve hasn't figured out what it's about yet, if you ask me....

    ReplyDelete
  2. While I understand the frustration that can arise from sitting in a room full of posturing scorekeepers, in a game like Eve with its central harvest/manufacture/destroy circle I’m also aware that though I’m not highly motivated to partake in said posturing I remain supremely grateful some people are. Killboard/Faction Tier/Nullsec Sov scorekeeping demands considerable space murder and space murder is good for my manufacturing business. Posture on scorekeepers. I like you that way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not so much that they posture, it's that they keep trying to inflict their view of New Eden upon those of us that don't. Have you DireNecessity heard the good word of efficiency percentages and kill:death ratio's yet? No? Could I have a moment of your time perhaps, so I can save your immortal pod soul? They're like EVE's jehovah witnesses. ;-)

      Delete
    2. Well and amusingly put Kaeda. The question for me is how to navigate the evangelists’ incessant barking. Me? I jovially accept their complimentary copy of The Space Watchtower while quietly slipping them a combat product price list (order form attached) and proceed on my merry way wryly bemused. Eve is a big raucous space city. I enjoy the cacophony.

      Delete
    3. Completely unrelated, I just want to say thanks to you two. This is the first smile I've had in a craptastic day.

      Delete
  3. Manufacturers revel in death = more sales

    ReplyDelete
  4. "posturing scorekeepers" - DireNecessity

    Very befitting description of the majority of Eve. I've come to the conclusion that Eve is about blowing up someone else's stuff just because it's there. Period. Yeah, sure, some people manufacture, mine, mission, etc... But for the most part it's a - destroy it because we can - mentality.

    After awhile it gets boring. It becomes a rat race for the same old shit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If EVE is boring, one of two things is happening - 1) you're playing it wrong (in that EVE is a game about constant goal re-invention) or 2) the game has lost its appeal.

      Delete
    2. Or 3) You've ran out of motivation/goals... because there are only so many things you can do in Eve and they eventually all feel the same.

      Solution to this is usually to find a new group of people to hang out with.

      Delete
  5. Eve is full of breakers.... here is a poem, I didn't write it but its sums up a the few good people in Eve and a majority of the people that make it not so great.

    I watched them tearing a building down,
    A gang of men in a busy town.
    With a ho, heave, ho and a lusty yell,
    They swung the beam and a side wall fell.
    I asked the foreman, "Are these men skilled?,
    The kind you'd hire if you were to build?"
    He gave a laugh and said, "No, indeed, common labor is all I need.
    I can easily wreck in a day or two,
    What builders have taken years to do."
    And so I asked as I went my way,
    Which of these roles have I tried to play?
    Am I a builder with a well-made plan, lifting others the best I can?
    Or am I a wrecker who walks the town,
    Content with the labor of tearing down?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Charm of the Familar

With a few picked up a shifts at work due to the holidays. I pondered logging in but I didn't have the energy to do so. Being able to say no to logging in is pleasant. Just as my youngest puppy interrupts me every fifteen minutes to pee, going to sleep instead of staying up is also pleasant. I had a lot of short slept nights when I was active in a corporation.

My next plan has been to learn how to scan again. The new map is in and I need to refresh my scanning skills. My hold is full of probes. My ship appears to be reasonably set up. I remembered how to hit my F key to cloak. In fact, I hit it a bit to fast. I need to get the ebb and flow of the tic back down.

I am also rusty in my paranoia. I idly switch to another window to research breadbowls and the soup I want to make later. Then I remember I am sitting, decloaked, off of a gate somewhere. Whoops. I did figure out a breadbowl recipe and soup as well.

The question was where do I relearn to scan? I need somewhere off the beate…

CSMX - Post #20

Summer is here and CCP is very much out of the office. Sion made a good point in wondering why everyone leaves Iceland when it has its best weather. What it means is that all is mostly quiet on the dev blog front. There are some things happening but the dev blogs and news announcements have not yet happened. The skill points were delivered on Tuesday so yay for unallocated skill points.

Over in CSM chat, there has been a lot of back and forth about sov and measuring the impact and success of things so far. I can say that CCP and the CSM are watching it. The pros and cons are coming in pretty hot and heavy. Some are being looked at now. Some have to see how things are going and if and how the direction needs to be tweaked.

In my corner, I'm starting to gather things together. The summit is in seven or so weeks. In between then and now I need to gather up my question list and write down a few topics of discussion. I'm starting now because I have personal vacation at the end of A…

TCS: Sugar's Non-Technical Guide to Her Low Sec Market

Gevlon shocked me by featuring my store in his blog, yesterday. My entire project has been something I mostly scraped together and have bumbled through to the best of my ability and sense. Early on, I started a naming dynamic to my posts so that people could avoid the blogs about the store. These blogs are titled TCS. Also, if you search for TCS those particular blogs are available.

I decided to create a more cohesive naming strategy because someone said, “I don’t know how interested your readers will be in your market posts.” I didn’t either. I wasn't going to not write them because I write about whatever interests me. It seemed that a naming convention would correct the situation. However, I’ve started to receive a trickle of eve-mail and e-mail about what I am doing. Sometimes people ask me for advice on how to approach their own low sec market or what they should pick and choose or just how to pick and choose.

Cheradenine Harper asked me about moving forward into the wider mark…