Skip to main content

.... Engineering?

I can say with ease that I quite like social engineering in Eve. I may not agree with the path that everyone takes with their social engineering but that is another topic. From The Cougar Store to my POCOpire and down to my CSM run, I've wound most of my game play into what can be done for, with, and by a player by just doing.

The downside of it is that is is rarely tangible or sustainable. Sometimes efforts build up and go through metamorphosis from construct to constructed, such a Eve University. As proud as I may be in the things that I have done and will do, none of them is tangible. My store will vanish if I stop tending it. I hope that I've shared enough of my mistakes and successes that it will endure in some way. My POCOpire was destroyed by an individuals choice and my own unwillingness to suck it up one more time. When I am no longer on the CSM I will vanish back into the background of the game. What we make rarely survives us.

Energy is not finite. I have struggled for the past six weeks and the echos of that are clear. My blog posts are down. My in game activities have disintegrated. I'm not quitting Eve. I am just very, very tired and something has to give. For me, its my creativity which is the fuel for this blog. My blog posts slowed down and while my blog is not some pillar that keeps Eve Online running it is a example of a project that can dissolve due to very few factors and none of them things that anyone can stop once they fall apart.

Eve Online is a highly complex game full of social interactions that make, break, and define it. While a fun statement to write it is one true to fact. It has also been one of the games glaring weaknesses. One of my happiest moments was when I saw that the new Opportunity system included instructions for double clicking in space to move. That simple, simple bit of information was available no where in the game before that time. I figured it out by doing a google search about "how to move in Eve" and I found a blog post about it. It was not even a forum post. That type of problem is a mechanical issue in my opinion. Such a simple thing should not be left to the social constructions of players where players educate players on the basics of the game.

The separation of the two increases in pace the further out you get. One of the side effects of knowledge is that we forget ignorance. What we know about the world becomes such a tangible aspect that we can no longer see it and in that comes a danger of believing that because something is 'common' knowledge that it is known.

Let's discuss my ignorance: Because I am not the brightest of people I have a tendency to happily share my ignorance. The other day it was about why I couldn't look at a ship. I was in a situation I am not often in. I was hanging around on a gate in high security space while cloaked. That may be normal for some but it is not normal for me. I was also presented with a ship that I had never seen in the flesh and a ship that is almost unheard of outside of high security space. In that time I decided to look at the ship and to my puzzlement I could not. Since then, I have been educated and told that the ship was in warp and that is why I could not look at it. If I use that information to recreate the situation I could say that the show was on autopilot. As soon as it uncloaked from gatecloak it was because autopilot was warping it. Therefore, I could not look at it.

"It is obvious if you do X," one person said. I've never done X. X did not include my play style. While a small thing and for some a thing of gross, unreasonable ignorance, I'd simply not in four years found myself in a situation to do a particular action in circumstance.

We are in a time of changing game mechanics. Proposals, theories, and ideas flow through the community. I have seen, "Well, we don't really use that or have this problem so the topic is not relevant and can be removed for convenience." There is a problem when the knowledge comes from "our knowledge of the topic is,". What happens when you leave? When your group dies? When you make a break for another part of Eve? None of these things may ever happen but what happens when they do?

Institutional knowledge is a powerful tool. But the game must be understandable in a way that someone without institutional knowledge can also play and gain that knowledge. It is easy to forget not knowing something. It is normal to believe what we built will always be there. But it has to be remembered that it won't be. Someone will always come along who is new. Someone who does not know you and may not want to know you or you them will wish to experience something. They to are playing the game and should have the ability to learn and figure out the game. Mechanics cannot be abandoned because "We never use that," or turned into complex lattices of interaction because "This is not a problem for us."

And now I will know that I cannot look at autopiloting Bowheads trying to waddle into warp. Now, it is obvious. A few days ago it was not. That is education. In this situation I could have figured it out on my own with some experimentation. Another time I will. But that is because I have the knowledge and the ability to do so within the mechanics of the game. I was fortunate that several someones reached out to help me. But I cannot rely on it. The game cannot rely on the relative altruism of its players.


Comments

  1. I’ve been reflecting the last few weeks on what so appeals about this game we play and have concluded that for me at least, one major component is size. This game is big. Impossibly big. Though I’ve played steadily for slightly over 6 years, I haven’t been most places and I haven’t done most things. And even those things I have done (some quite steadily for 6 years) keep revealing unexpected quirks and displaying room for individual improvement. At this pace, I’ll die long before I get bored. Still, like so much in life, that which generates ongoing intrigue remains forever a double edged sword. Eve’s greatest strength is also Eve greatest weakness.

    So yes it’s probably true that post CSM you’ll ‘vanish back into the background’ Sugar. In the big world that is Eve, notoriety requires constant sustenance. For those that don’t relish celebrity however, such size related consequence is as much positive feature as detrimental weakness.

    In similar manner, the loss of institutional knowledge is both troubling and glorious. Troubling because the loss hinders progression. Glorious because it creates the space to reexplore and relearn. Some group figured it out once. Some group can probably figure it out again. Big, old Eve just may one day have ancient magics to be mined. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.

    CCP failing to teach players basic movement in Eve is terribly annoying and ought not require a Google search. But the delicate interstices of grid-fu? I’m not so confident CCP should be documenting/teaching that (especially not on first blush).

    So I take your “Mechanics cannot be . . . turned into complex lattices of interaction because ‘This is not a problem for [experienced] us’” to heart while at the same time not so readily accepting that “The game cannot rely on the relative altruism of its players.” History’s proven this game is exasperatingly explorable. Such is the mixed blessing conundrum wound up in our impossibly big game.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The NPE should be about teaching appropriate mechanics to new players. No new players want to learn about weird and strange stuff that they've never seen before. I guess it's the depth of.mechanics that we want to learn.

    It would be nice.if.there was an complete industry tutorial, but it would have to cover many many independent elements that combine to create.profit.. Standings, skills, refine ratio, production location, blueprint research. And probably more!

    Is it any wonder people get frustrated? Look at everything.you.have to learn to.earn a.profit!

    (I don't even do industry because of everything I'd have to learn)

    Industry in EVE is complicated without being.unified. People rely.on out of game guides because ingame documentation is awful.

    Rob K.

    As a complete aside, if I forwarded CCP my calendar, could they really really not host.live events when I'm away. It's great that.CCP's doing them, but. If there was buildup, none saw.it

    Apologies for typing this.on mobile. I can see how many typos there are!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you are stumbling against one of the fundamentals of life rather than just a feature of Eve. My mother died some years ago and other than myself and my brother there is not much left that she made. Numerous craft projects occupied ber days as well as cleaninng house and various jobs. The crafts likely landed in the landfill years ago, the homes if they still exist are not recognizeable and the businesses gone or motoring on in ways that have nothing to do with her contributions. My dad is retired and the projects he spent a lifetime on are old and mostly forgotten.

    It happens to us all, even the great figures of history after a few generations are mere cartoons of their actual selves with their creations gone or changed into things which they would not recognize and perhaps not even like. That is the nature of nature, the pace online is just a bit faster but the effect is all the same.

    As for the CSM but, so it fades as,all things do but there is more to you than that. I read your blog before CSM and if you write it I will likely read it afterward.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …