Skip to main content

Fanfest 2015 - Wormhole Round Table #1

I only made it to the first wormhole round table, not the second due to schedule conflicts. Some of this was 'see the keynote'. My handwriting eludes me sometimes. It actually gets better as I go through the week and get used to writing again. Some of this stuff is amazingly bad scrawl.

Request: A way to change clones in a wormhole
A: Keynote

Q: Mass Rigs: Can we have more sizes of them? (My handwriting eludes me this time. I do know that the topic was about more types of mass rigs on ships)
A: We have to be careful about these. Lower mass is a very hard to balance thing. We have no concrete plans to add more rigs along these lines.
Discussion: This was about the worries of allowing ships into wormholes they are not meant to be in because their mass has decreased to the point that they can slip in.
Q: How about wormholes that allow certain ships then?
A: Interesting thought.
Note: This entire segment was a bit hard to keep track of and hear because people had a hard time being quiet. I will also note that it was one of the very first sessions on the first day so excitement was high.

Q: Will the ore changes in sov change the ore in wormholes as well?
A: Yes. A lot of the changes will mirror.

Q: Polarization timer?
A: They have thought about it but it is very hard to show off what timer is what when there are multiple timers and multiple wormholes. Maybe show the longest? Or show one related to aggression timers?

Q: We'd like to repackage things in a wormhole.
A: Go to the keynote

Q: XL SMA divisions? People share ships. It is a lot to sort through to find the right one.
A: Keynote

Q: Can they assemble T3 in a wormhole?
A: We'd like to make that happen (Keynote).

Q: We'd like bookmarks to propagate faster. Currently it takes about five minutes for corporate bookmarks to update.
A: Larger corps cause a performance issue because the game has to tell everyone that there is a bookmark to update. They have looked into increasing the copy speeds even more but at the moment for these things no.

Q: Any plans or ideas for wormholes that CCP has?
A: No current plans to make chance but they are open to change. They want to hear the feedback from the players such as how JF and Freighters can get into Thera from low sec. They'd like to provide things like that for the sov changes but they have to figure out how to make it work.

Topic: (not sure who brought this up) They'd like to increase the use of the quantum flux generator to target a part of space without making it to strong.
Answer from the room - No.
Devs: It will be difficult to balance. Very hard to balance.

Q: Why no moon mining in WH?
A: It is to strong. Also there is a form of layers of where things come from. T3 comes from WH. T2 comes from kspace. They want to keep that separation.

Q: Can we make money from our own statics?
Devs: Shall we cause a shit storm?
Players: Yes
Devs: We may be doing a buff nerf to wormholes. We are looking at capital escalations and how they are farmed.  The goal is to give you escalations to do and complete and still receive somewhat similar (if less) then what you are doing now without farming the same four sites over and over again. They will look at the respawn timers as well. They feel that they can do similar things  with what is there. The farming is an invisible gameplay and that in itself is awkward.
Q: When are you looking to do this?
A: (I don't have anything written down :P sorry)

Q: Better repairing in a pos?
A: See the keynote

I then slipped out but it was mostly wrapping up and discussing what had been said.


Comments

  1. Thanks for posting your notes. The biggest concern for my team right now is the structure change. It feels like the deck is being shuffled and we have no idea what the next hand will look like.

    Beyond the obvious concerns about how we function, scout, protect our ships and such there is the opportunity to perhaps have something more than we do now. Personally I hope the new system gives us a chance to build a better sandcastle as a group. Progress is more than merely existing and while eve has many destructive outlets there are few constructive ones. Not everyone fears change but there is great concern.

    - Kynric

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …