Skip to main content

Reasonableness

And with changes come discussion of said changes. Over several topics in the last few weeks I have harped upon the idea of reasonableness in balance and decision making. When someone tells me that something is to strong if done in an exact way I ask is that method reasonable?

Reasonable

  1. fair and sensible
  2. fairly or moderately good
  3. not too expensive

Reasonableness is a very flexible concept. Something can be reasonable on many levels. Using a hammer can be reasonably expected to be done by an averge person. Using an electron microscope can be reasonable expected to be done by the average scientist. However, not being accessible to the average person does not make the complexity of an electron microscope unreasonable.

Reasonableness and accessibility are a bit different although they overlap each other. You can add in words like general and such but what is reasonable differs from person to person. In Eve, I often have a discussion where someone discusses a topic. They discuss that topic well and point out how strong or weak or complex or easy it is. My response is often, "How does the average, reasonable player play?"

Many of us who read blogs, forums, eft warrior, and engage in Eve outside of Eve are somewhat super users. We talk, think, judge, weigh, create, and indulge ourselves in the game. Are we a reasonable standard? This topic has come up recently in our POS chat. Is having to have third party tools to function on a sustainable level reasonable? Is having to have IT people in your corporation to help you manage well enough to play with others reasonable. Is that the standard that we want the game to be built and catered to?

I can keep lobbing out examples, but I'm tired. It's a simple enough thought without another thousand words of explination.

Comments

  1. Is it reasonable that 4 ships (3 of which have a lot of fight-stopping power) suddenly go invisible to a majority of the ships in New Eden? (Combat probes accepted as their counter)

    I think reasonable changes would go along the lines of:
    'Recon Ships are now un-probable, but you can see them on the d-scanner'
    'Recon Ships will show up, but as 'Unknown Vessel' on the d-scanner' (Further, I'd say that any ship outside of 7AU could potentially show up as this...)
    'Recon Ships will appear on D-Scan if they are within 7 AU or on Grid'

    The current idea, though it is usable by all sides in an engagement, just is not very reasonable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ask yourself the impact of such a ship in a system with no local

      Delete
    2. then ask yourself the positive aspects of having more risk in wormholes where the profit is staggering

      Delete
    3. I would not have gone there if I was king, but the sky is not falling either. Do thus in your corporation. Get two recons, one combat and one force both with similar scan res. Put a target somewhere. Have each in turn tackle the target and compare seconds from the instant of appearing on overview (one will be stuck in warp for a few seconds the other will be sitting through decloak delay.)

      I did the experiment and found the answer nearly the same, it did not make enough of a difference to comment on. Then remember the cloak starts his process at a better place relative to the target and the cloaky is still better. I think FW mediums is the only serious issue as the cloaky in the killzone is prevented so this does introduce something new in that context. Yes in wormholes it removes a few seconds of dscan vulnerability but that doesnt matter all that much as you will likely still have a cloaky find where on grid the recon needs to land. I suppose also the recon hacker and ratter will now be seen but that seems like a small concern that isnt worth much breath. IThe rest is a lot of noise which is crowding out all other discussion. My biggest sadness with the change is my huginn loses its launchers. The arty huginn just is not interesting to me (also not enough fitting unless severe shoehorning occurs) and autocannons dont reach far enough to compliment the webs.

      - Kynric

      Delete
  2. picture says a thousand words
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-MqzptJQ-Ams/UtEyf4SPhOI/AAAAAAAAIjM/IVaVdjoT9k8/s1600/eve-economy-2013.jpg

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …