Skip to main content

A Short Thought: Drone Names

There are no drone implants.

Well, I said the logic behind that makes sense. If we were to have implants for drones that would connect us to them, correct? Well, the problem I see with that is there are five of them and one of you. What happens when they take over? Suddenly, the drones are flying you. You're fighting for your freedom as they make you slam into frigates and and go assist strangers.

It is a bit disturbing.

However, with the new look on drones for ships where they only get one or two or three drones, I started to wonder... do we need a way to name them? After all these are our companions. And this is Eve. We don't do pets. But really, Cynthia and Phillip the drones sound good, no?

This has been a non-serious post.

Comments

  1. Good God no! If we name them we’ll grow attached to them. I learned my lesson with characters. Characters with consciously chosen names grow an interior life and begin making demands. It wasn’t so bad prior to multiple training on the same account since it mostly meant the characters bickered with each other but now, with the mere cost of a plex, each and every one of the named characters know they could be training and it’s my miserliness alone that holds them back. Meanwhile, the characters I merely labeled have proven much more complaint. I had to pull a fast one on the boats. They believe they are named but, truth be told, when a boat is lost its replacement gets the same name - labels in disguise. And now, now you ‘jokingly’ suggest we name the drones and multiply the web of lies? You have a malicious streak Sugar. Cruel, callous, despicable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not quite, but could you leave Bambi behind?

      Delete
  2. In response to your first statement: Drones don't have implants or drugs, and can't be overheated. Those three things are the only reasons Ishtars aren't incredibly broken.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sure would be nice if sentry drones applied their damage in much the same way as battleship guns. Trying to peg a well flown cepter with 1400mm arty is all but impossible yet bouncers seem to have no problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What if they jumped onto battleship guns and shoot from them like cowboys riding broncos?

      Delete
  4. Why not. We can name cargo cans which are a whole lot less interesting. Although if I were granted one unit of developing time naming drones would not make the cut.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We will stick with a quarter unit of developing time?

      Delete
  5. I would actually support this option because it would solve a minor grip of mine. Cycling drones due to incoming damage, then launching the most recently recalled drone instead of one that has had a chance to recharge its shields.

    Admittedly, this was more of an issue for me when I was just starting the game, but I could see this as being a slight boost to quality of life with out having severe repercussions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, I'll be serious.

      The drone interface leaves everything to be desired.

      Delete
  6. My wife names their folders. "turdmonkeys" for her flight of Hobgoblin II's and "roaches" for her flight of salvage drones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My drone folders have random typos in them. Its awful. Then I get used to the typos and name all the other ones the same thing for consistency.

      Delete
  7. I knew a gallente pilot who loved his drones like this... Had a name for all of them. He always warned people to watch out for Billy... he did... funny things :P

    ReplyDelete
  8. Do enjoy it when i can laugh out loud at a blog
    Thanks Sugar, much appreciated

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th