Skip to main content

CSM: Running for Office: Week Ten

I've been waiting to write this particular post for quite a while now. Unlike every post before and every post after, this particular moment is very pure and allows me a unique opportunity for untinted honesty. It is not that I have not been honest. It is that voting is closed and the election will not be decided until next week. What I say now cannot be construed as an attempt to direct my election or a reflection of winning or losing.

Thank you for voting for me. Thank you for considering me and putting me on your ballot even if you did not pick me as your first choice. I cannot express how honored I am at the trust put in me and I appreciate that people took the time to follow through with me.

Next weekend my game life changes a bit. I either make it onto CSM9 and from thereon become a member of CSM9 or I do not make it and from thereon I become a person who failed their bid to CSM9. One way or another some will see everything that I say and do through that tinted piece of glass. Because I believe in something I have altered everything around me.

It feels weird.

This entire process is one that I entered without a clue. When I went to the MD/VA/DC meet Epi leaned over and said, "Off the record, why are you really running?" I looked at him like a deer in headlights. I knew what I was about to say would sound fake so I said, "I know that this sounds fake but there isn't any off the record. I'm really running for the reasons I listed."

That's because I am. I've discovered that I am not just passionate about low sec I am passionate about advocating low sec and my ideas and beliefs in general. I believe in myself and my concepts of Eve inside of low sec and out. I've been accused of running for eve-fame and attention. I hate when my corpmates call me a politician. I dislike that the things I write are looked at through the measurement of how I may be trying to work the election. My own words, my blog which I have tended for over two years became both my savior and my demon. It was nice that I could calmly tell people that they had two years to dredge through if they wanted to call me out on something I have said. It was awful because I started worrying about everything I wrote and how it would be perceived.

Tending my forum post was hard. I got hit with a lot. I was the first person to post and the first thing I encountered was resistance. A "Who are you?" to run. I asked my boys to back off from defending me. While their support is appreciated and if they had not supported me people would be puzzled, I needed to show that I could stand up for myself and deal with suboptimal situations. Not everyone is going to like me. Not everyone is going to support me. I needed to show people how I handled myself. I believe that I did so.

The questions where very staggering. Many of them are outside of the ability of the CSM. Often, my first reading rolled around my head something like, "Dear Sugar, how will you personally recode Eve, create cold fusion, and repopulate the baleen whale?" However, I looked at it not as a reflection of me as a CSM but an attempt to gain access to my thoughts, ideas, and ability to communicate. "That is not something that I feel CCP should worry about," was never my answer. I spent many evenings answering forum questions to the best of my ability. My writing has improved. I had a tendency to write in the passive voice a lot and I had to snip that out or else I diluted the confidence I felt in my own words.

When voting ended my thread had over 14,000 views. I have to admit, I wonder why I got as many views as I did and if it means anything.

I was told by one person to ignore the forum thread because it will not get me votes and instead work on contacting corporate leaders and getting them to endorse me to their corporation. That is not me. I did reach out to some groups and I asked people to help me reach out. I chatted, I had coms sessions, I answered mails and I did my best to be accessible. I have been on six podcasts over the course of the election. I have written blog posts and I have written thousands of words on my forum thread. I have let every single person that wished to contact me in game or out and interview me, interview me. I realized after a while that this was a job interview and that I was asking several thousand people to hire me. With that perspective it was easier to engage every individual every time and try to find out what they wanted of me.

Not everything was great and full of high points and self discovery. Some of it was bad. Such as the term, "If you want to win you will do anything."

I have personal and moral limits. I cannot do anything to get elected. That is not the type of person that I am. I understand that I cannot do anything if I am not elected. Yet, when I was told to find a bloc to vote me and to give them what I had to to get their support, I said no. When I was told to disregard the individual and focus on groups, I said no. When it was suggested that I use a complex dance of alts to get invited to places and things so that it would not seem that I was directly asking but that there was a significant interest in me in an attempt to convince people that I was a big deal, I said no. When I was told that I would have to give into the politics to be elected so I might as well start making contacts, I said no. When I was asked to endorse candidates that I could not honestly endorse personally or for any of my platforms, I said no. Maybe all of those nos are wrong but each one sat poorly with me. I want this but I do not want it with a bad taste in my mouth.

I believe that the people who voted for me are voting for me. The person and the vision and personality that I bring to the table. I can say that I did not betray their belief in me or my belief in myself. If this person that I am is not the person who attracts enough support from the Eve community to achieve a CSM seat I will have that answer.

But, before I get all self righteous, I have to make sure that I give it my everything. That is why the posts, podcasts, blogs, chats, and in general an effort to put myself out there. I am not the loud, boisterous, look at me type. I doubt I will go off on a rant or rage. I may do snarky. I may seem too mild tempered to some. That is something Kirth pointed out in his review of me and something that my podcast interviews showed was not the case. The relationships I have developed also show me that I was able to get across my personality and interests and what I cared about.

The respect that I want from others I must also give to others.

If no one makes it onto the CSM to represent low sec it will be a shame. We are not organized like the null blocs and that is our weakness. One comment on an article was that the commenter did not want low sec to change. Well, a representative preserves as much as they try to enact change. And sometimes, no matter how much we want things not to change they will. Having a voice allows us to have some standing in this.

The STV system is both good and bad. it allows people not to 'waste' their votes. Vote wasting is a term I learned about last year where people do not vote for the person they want to vote for because they do not believe that person will make it. being able to pick other people allows them not to feel as if they wasted anything and vote more true to themselves. The reverse is that people vote for me lower on their ballot. The support is good but I still need a certain amount of top placements to make it through the elimination rounds.

I'm tired of worrying about it. I have been obsessed but not as bad once voting started. I felt that I had done what I could and now nature would take its course. Then things got even busier which surprised me. The continued interest was good and healthy. Even with voting closed I get mails and conversations. I'm delighted to share what I can.

What's next?

Well win or lose I'm still playing Eve. I have a deployment to supply, a history series to finish, a dreadnought to welp, and plenty of new topics to write about. There is no stopping me and I'll see people at Eve Vegas (whenever we get the dates). Anything past that we shall see.

Side notes:

I'm sorry to everyone who finds it weird to call me Sugar. I didn't think about it when I created the account. Sug or SK both work.

No one wanted to talk about PvP. Everyone wanted to talk about everything else to the point that some forgot I PvPed. I do not think this is bad but it was amusing.

I avoided promoting my blog on my forum thread. People don't want to click links.

I had to remember that repeating myself is okay. not everyone has seen or heard everything I have said. Bonus, for those who listen multiple times they will see that I am consistent.

My corp was fantastic in understanding that I might be logged in but I couldn't spend a lot of time in space.

Thanks to Wex for his grammar stick. My knuckles may be forever bruised but I am a better poster for it.

The greater Eve blog and podcast community was amazing.


  1. Hi Sugar. I very much hope you make it onto CSM9. I think you will but I guess you are looking forward to the announcement at fanfest!

    Your interview in the new podside format was excellent. Your thoughts regarding the interplay of lowsec, high and low almost perfectly mirrored my own. Long live lowsec!

    1. Hi Zappity! :) Thank you. I'm very much hoping I will be able to bring my viewpoint to the table.

  2. Sug you won regardless of the vote count; you spoke open & honestly, remained open minded, and didn't sacrifice your integrity.

    1. Thank you, Shawn. It is a truly ugly tangle and there will always be some who would rather win. It is a subject not all will agree on. My standards come with the package.

  3. You ended up on my voting list fairly high despite that I am high sec carebear. I sincerely hope that you get through.

    1. Thank you. I know I'm not a high sec player but I think my views and thoughts have been clear about it.

    2. I am the anon you responded here. I voted you because I think you would make good CSM (in no particular order) for low sec, industry and the game as whole.

  4. I can honestly say I've never cared this much about a CSM election before. I'm a high sec carebear/explorer/gadfly type who occasionally has forays into more dangerous areas, and you were the #1 vote on all my ballots.

    If you don't make it this year, I think you'll have enough name recognition in 2015 to make it then. I have a hunch you won't have to wait, though. Fingers crossed! :-)

    1. If it helps thisnidnmy most exciting CSM run too ;)

      The name thing is there. It is very strange that. Hopefully people like what they see.

  5. "When I went to the MD/VA/DC meet Epi leaned over and said, "Off the record, why are you really running?""

    My apologies for the question. It was not meant as a cynical swipe against all things politicians but based on general curiosity. I have followed your blog for a long time and throughout appreciated your concern for your game and your environment. But writing a blog, seeding a market and supporting your "boys" is one thing. Running for CSM raises the bar considerably and I genuinely wondered why you would do it.

    But our regional EVE channel is already preparing for a celebration when you are elected - there is no doubt in our mind that EVE needs a lot of Sugar.

    Fly dangerously. Epi

    1. To me they are one and the same so the leap was not huge. It was getting the confidence to do it when I expected to be laughed at. I also know I sound very text book about why and what I want to do.

      It is probably my markets fault. Learning that I could change pieces of the world with tanicity and effort was an eye opener.

      I have a firm personal opinion that you have to do something to make something happens. Sometimes that means you have to become what you want to happen.

  6. "Thanks to Wex for his grammar stick."

    You're most welcome. Never fear, the physical bruises will heal. The emotional ones... probably not as quickly.

  7. This post illustrates why I encouraged you to run, endorsed you, and put you in the top non-wormhole spot on my voting slate. You deserve to get in and I hope you do.

    But in case you don't, remember Mike took 3-4 runs to finally get in. And take a page from Steve's campaign - he has been running for a year and has taken many of the lessons of his first run to heart.

    Good luck Sugar. Lowsec and CSM need you.

    1. Thanks, Rhavas. Is not it amusing how we console ourselves with future plans to soften a possible negative thing?

  8. I have to echo Rhavas, this post clearly shows why, like him, I too put you at #1 spot ahead even of the people who represent W-space... and while I personally cannot stand K-space, I respect those who find their happyplace there.

    You may be a Lowsec player, but I believe you care about all of EVE at it's core.I have a feeling that you would not support a plan that would buff lowsec at the price of really harming another playstyle... It ALL has to balance on the razor edge of PvP.

    Now, while I think you have a very good shot at a seat this year, please don't be discouraged if you don't make it. I know Mike Azariah and he kept at it for 3 years... Jester had him in his #4 spot this year, gave him a solid endorsement, and endorsed you right after Mike, that says something.

    Good luck, wish I could be there to celebrate with you whether you win or simply have to run again!!

  9. You are a wonderful person Sugar!

    Please understand that I did not vote for you as I don't support the CSM.

    1. It's fine. Everyone has to make their own decisions in this thing. For some, it is to state their disbelief. I'd not ask you to go against that anymore than I'd expect you to ask me to go against my beliefs.

  10. You got a lot of backing around the blogosphere - I just hope that translates into votes for you. Sorry I didn't end up flying my "Sugar Kyle for CSM" Jaguar around lowsec more. Next time (election / re-election) maybe there should be a Jaguar roam for such...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log


Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th