Skip to main content

Rambling: Really Reality?

[TL;DR: Thoughts about the balance aspect of fun, needful and needless complexity, and reality]

Since the small DDoS attack a few days ago I have been dealing with multiple socket closures when I log in. Currently, it takes an average of 10 attempts before one of them clicks and actually lets me into the game. This would be frustrating on a normal level. I come home and look forward to playing. I often have a list of chores that I wish to accomplish. I may have been watching a skill queue tick down and I want to address it before I forget about it. Having to try multiple times to log in is frustrating. It becomes annoying when it happens across all of my accounts that I want to log in.

Eventually, I get everyone where they need to be. I grumble some but once logged in the frustration vanishes. I've never been shy of the fact that I am a creature of alts.  It is the way that I have been able to play as many areas of the game as I do. Chella, for instance, is gnawing through her capital skills. I pondered in Jabber if Sugar really needs to be able to fly a carrier for the occasional instance that we want to do a fast jump to a target as we did a few days ago. Looking at Chella, who has been doing capital skills for a long time now, my answer is no. Help me but my patience is only but so great and I like finishing skills sometimes.

But, if I only had one account? If everyone only had one account? Eve would be a very different place.

I know a few people who only have one account. They, like solo players play a very hard game of Eve. I have a lot of respect for that. I'd be nonfunctional with only one account. Or, I should say that I'd be non-functional in many of my current hobbies. I'd have to give up huge chunks of what I do in Eve for a long time and that is an unpleasant thought.

I sometimes see the one account or one character only arguments. Beyond how hard that would be to enforce I'm not sure that it would make for better game play. It would make for different game play. Someone would have to be the link ship sitting off grid. Someone would have to be the ten minute cyno. The scout would be a scout but people would still be able to AFK cloak to their hearts content. And while things would be very different would they be more compelling and increase the games playability?

Often when I argue with Vov and his quest to nerf highsec income into the ground I argue that his point is based around an ISK per hour figure. As someone who does not play based around ISK per hour, his equation would maim me and players like myself. And, I often ask, "While it may sound good on paper and in numbers, would it be fun and engaging?"

A lot of mechanics changes, ideas, nerfs, and buffs are based around numbers and statics. Eve players tend to work with the mechanics of the game when they suggest things. But, like the world of one chracter or the world defined by ISK per hour, would it still be a fun place to play? At what point do we have to look at what makes sense and what might be fun?

I think of this a lot with physics engines and things that don't make sense but they just are. We where throwing around deployable structure ideas. One idea from Sigrun was an object that created a cloud of jet can like objects to decloak something. Mine was a deployable that turned into a large collidable object. These could be scattered on the grid and they'd cause the ships to have obstacles. However, we all know our guns are magical and shoot through objects to hit spaceships. And if they stopped being magical it would change aspects of combat. One could hide being a POCO and let it absorb the damage. It would change things. For the better? Maybe?

Even as I write a question floated up in my chat, "Would the game be better without skillbook purchases as they are?" This also came up on twitter the other day too. On twitter I made a joke, but tonight I said that it might be a small thing but it would change the game. I don't know if that change would be bad but it would be a change. I spent my first few weeks in game in Derelik. There are no schools down there. I purchased my skillbooks from players reselling in one of the main trade stations because I didn't know any better. I didn't understand skillbook sales at the time. Now I know better and I know that you'd have to fly deeper into Empire's heart to find a school. Is that bad? In Molden Heath all the schools are in low sec. Null sec and wormhole groups have to plan and move skillbooks around. I'd not count going to get skillbooks as 'fun' but their current structure causes a ripple of activities and opportunities that would vanish. Does 'makes sense' win just because it makes sense? Or, can the need to sell us ads and track our market habits (my twitter answer to why we can't download skillbooks) explain away the reason why Eve can copy my brain at death and send it to a waiting body but not let me have a kindle. And then how do we account for rare skillbooks? A DRM key drops in the site?

It is amusing but understandable that the argument of reality can be more con than pro in a game. We are, after all, playing in a virtual reality. Sometimes changes are introduced simply for the sake of 'it makes sense' and 'it would be more real'. Often, it helps us adjust to or accept changes introduced. But sometimes, when the idea bubbles to the surface it may make sense without being fun. Or it may be fun without making sense. I going to say that the general goal is to find that sweet spot in the middle. Somewhere between complex and reasonable, fun and as sensible as internet spaceships are going to get.


  1. I may have commented on this on your blog before, but since you mentioned the physics model. One of my first surprises as a brand new player was on a newbie training mission - it was near an asteroid field, so I moved to put an asteroid between me and the attacking NPC ship. Imagine my surprise when they kept shooting me. That's something that I think a lot of younger players might consider unacceptably immersion breaking - they're used to much more sophisticated physics engines. As a programmer and a old geezer who has been playing video games for 30+ years, I just laughed and realized CCP wasn't willing to do the collision detection needed. Though then I was disappointed that my ship could get stuck inside a collidable object and still be shot the whole time. I know this is a big architecture issue, and one that could be particularly problematic for big fights, but I think it's going to limit Eve new player adoption long term.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log


Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th