Skip to main content

Blog Banter #53 - Unstructured Structure

The Overview. Is it sufficient? If not how can it be improved? Is there some way to replace it? Does it give too much information, or not enough? Please be creative and specific as the overview currently is the heartbeat of the GUI.
Blog Banter #53, Kirith Kodichi 
I didn't start using the overview until I had been playing for a few weeks. I learned to right click on things to interact with them in space. The things I did add to my overview (asteroids) I interacted with in space and used my Overview as a distance gauge. The overview was something of a status bar and I mostly ignored it. That was because I didn't expect to interact with it to interact with the game.

These days the overview is an unconscious thing. It is something that is registered automatically from habit. When I have multiple screens up I leave them layered with their overview showing. Flickers in it catch my eye at amazing speeds. That is because I now know what the overview is and why it is important to me.
When the question was posted, "is the overview the best way to get information," I had a knee jerk reaction of, "Of course." But, that was just a knee jerk reaction without any thought. I was defending a habit without thinking about that habit.

My second response was, "We can't have it all in space." It was a fretful response. The discovery scanner, for instance, visually shows us where things are in space. But, Eve is a three dimensional environment. I've always loved games where I get to swim or fly properly. It is exhilarating to have up and down as immediate travel options. It also comes with another wave of information that I have to process. My Eve experience now tells me that I'd have someone slip up on me and have me locked and pointed before I could even see where or who they where.

Information is gathered through multiple methods. Having one of my cynos killed the other day reminded me of that. The sound of being locked immediately caught my attention. It gave me time to get myself ready to warp out when my rookie ship died. Instead of thinking about changing the overview itself into some other form that gives the same information, perhaps we need to cause it to create information on more levels. Sounds are good. Right now we have pinpoints that go from module to target in space to target selection icon. Maybe an overview that could be integrated with that would be nice.

I think the two things that would more interest me are more editing options. I'd like to be able to color all logistics ships names blue for instance. Right now we can do some editing based off of standings and security status but it'd be interesting if we could create more, personal colored, bold, and blinks on our own without having to go edit the actual file that holds our overview.

The overview is also a pain in the butt to manage. I've deleted mine accidentally more times than I can imagine trying to tweak it and having my changes not stay. A better method to edit and personalize the overview and save it would be lovely.

I think that a modular overview could be interesting. If there was a way to break it up or down. Right now we have tabs but what if those tabs could each be a separate window? Right now we fight for screen space but that does not mean take away the option to use more of it. The true best thing would be an overview that detached from the client completely, but I suspect that isn't in the works.

Similar to many aspects of Eve's UI, the overview is old and that age makes us wonder if we need something different. But, similar to many aspects of Eve's UI a refresher, properly done, can improve a system. I'm leery of ripping things out just because. I head right back to the change in the asset management when the tree was added and the ability to have multiple item windows was removed.  Just because it is there, and works, does not mean it has to change to be better. In that, I'm reminded of my apps. My phone chirps at me and an app updates itself and suddenly, all of the functionality and simplicity I loved was gone because it was to functional and to simple so it must not have been good enough.

Shiny isn't better. Many a officer fit ship has gone down while they learned that the hard way. If the overview is to be improved it needs to be done with the objective to bring a better overview forward and not just because it is there.



Comments

  1. Tikktokk TokkzikkMarch 7, 2014 at 6:52 AM

    I think the overview is perfectly fine as is, but CCP should work on making it less necessary. Maybe add to the tactical overlay. Stuff like an arrow near each ship pointing in the dirction it's going and length depending on the its speed. It would add a lot of useful information without being spreadsheet-y. Could also have overlay options like overview options so we can choose which information is important to us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A concerned MinmatarMarch 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM

    It's unclear to me why we should change something that fulfills its function so well as the overview does.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The big thing that comes to mind is that 'the view' is an equilateral pyramid while the overview gives a full globular view.

    The one thing I would wish for - and it may be there but I've not found it - would be a way to tie overview to view. So if I've tweaked it to make all enemy EW to flash alternately yellow and red, the 'dot' on my view, or on the borders of my view, flash in sync.

    Yes, I'd still have to make my own tweaks to the view, and I'd have to train myself so 'these flashes' mean I need to maneuver and 'those flashes' mean I need to click-target (whether with the overview or on the HUD just depends). And so on and so forth.

    Oh, and tying this all to the tactical view would make me happier.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There's one very good reason to pitch the current Overview: CCP Punkturis has said that it's a fragile creature, and all fragile, fidgety code should be wiped out on principle. It's just an albatross around CCP's neck otherwise.

    As far as there being a list-based, configurable interface that provides an overview of what's around you? Sure, it's incredibly useful. Possibly even too useful.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Charm of the Familar

With a few picked up a shifts at work due to the holidays. I pondered logging in but I didn't have the energy to do so. Being able to say no to logging in is pleasant. Just as my youngest puppy interrupts me every fifteen minutes to pee, going to sleep instead of staying up is also pleasant. I had a lot of short slept nights when I was active in a corporation.

My next plan has been to learn how to scan again. The new map is in and I need to refresh my scanning skills. My hold is full of probes. My ship appears to be reasonably set up. I remembered how to hit my F key to cloak. In fact, I hit it a bit to fast. I need to get the ebb and flow of the tic back down.

I am also rusty in my paranoia. I idly switch to another window to research breadbowls and the soup I want to make later. Then I remember I am sitting, decloaked, off of a gate somewhere. Whoops. I did figure out a breadbowl recipe and soup as well.

The question was where do I relearn to scan? I need somewhere off the beate…

CSMX - Post #20

Summer is here and CCP is very much out of the office. Sion made a good point in wondering why everyone leaves Iceland when it has its best weather. What it means is that all is mostly quiet on the dev blog front. There are some things happening but the dev blogs and news announcements have not yet happened. The skill points were delivered on Tuesday so yay for unallocated skill points.

Over in CSM chat, there has been a lot of back and forth about sov and measuring the impact and success of things so far. I can say that CCP and the CSM are watching it. The pros and cons are coming in pretty hot and heavy. Some are being looked at now. Some have to see how things are going and if and how the direction needs to be tweaked.

In my corner, I'm starting to gather things together. The summit is in seven or so weeks. In between then and now I need to gather up my question list and write down a few topics of discussion. I'm starting now because I have personal vacation at the end of A…

TCS: Sugar's Non-Technical Guide to Her Low Sec Market

Gevlon shocked me by featuring my store in his blog, yesterday. My entire project has been something I mostly scraped together and have bumbled through to the best of my ability and sense. Early on, I started a naming dynamic to my posts so that people could avoid the blogs about the store. These blogs are titled TCS. Also, if you search for TCS those particular blogs are available.

I decided to create a more cohesive naming strategy because someone said, “I don’t know how interested your readers will be in your market posts.” I didn’t either. I wasn't going to not write them because I write about whatever interests me. It seemed that a naming convention would correct the situation. However, I’ve started to receive a trickle of eve-mail and e-mail about what I am doing. Sometimes people ask me for advice on how to approach their own low sec market or what they should pick and choose or just how to pick and choose.

Cheradenine Harper asked me about moving forward into the wider mark…