Skip to main content

Fly it Like you Stole It

I get into the dumbest arguments in game. I know better and I often try not to step into arguments that are nothing but a circular action of ego and opinion. However, I often fall from my high horse and often that is when I am in Eve Uni chat. It is not that I expect to convince anyone of my opinion it is that in all of the noise and chest beating that the new players are reading I figure I might as well throw out my own noise and chest beating.

I talk about things I am not supposed to talk about. I do the same on my blog. I say the things I am not supposed to say because Eve is just a game. Somehow, the social pressures others are exerting on each other are ignored. Play Eve how you want as long as you play it my way is what those displays really say.

Ship loss is something that is important to discuss with new players. They have to be removed from the idea that they should never lose their ships. In PvE or PvP ships are going to be lost. That is a tremendous moment where many players are lost to Eve early in their careers. If a kernel of thought can be inserted early on, that loss happens and it is an okay thing to happen, they may catch onto that when they are most stressed and use it as a life preserver instead of rage quitting.

You are not supposed to mind losing your ship in Eve. People poke each other for tears. "Is he angry?" they ask themselves in a more vernacular type of slang. "I believe that he is angry." Oh. Interesting. So, if losing your ship does not matter why would anyone believe that anyone would ever be 'angry' or 'mad' over losing their ship? Perhaps because losing ones ship does bother some more than others?

There is some disconnect that puzzles me where if anything has an aspect of importance that importance must be taken and slammed into the ground until it is unrecognizable. Losing a ship cannot matter. It must not matter. Because it does matter that emotion must be eradicated. Some announce that they enjoy the loss. It feels good and excites them. Or there are justified reasons for why losing a ship is the best thing that can happen to them every day.

One of the latest reasons I read, that started this entire thing, was that "losing my ship means I had a fight." Sure. So does not losing your ship. So does nether party losing their ships.  I can take a ship out and return in that same ship and have had a game session full of spaceship fights.

There is such a thing as going out and taking every fight and pushing yourself and your ship with full non stop aggression it is a path that normally ends in an explosion. It is not a path made to reach the explosion to scream at the organismic joy of ones ship exploding around them as if that is the ultimate moment that they have played and fought all day to achieve ship loss. Although, as I roll my eyes at what is said I more think it is that losing the ship is the end of the line. It is all used up and for many using everything as much and as hard as they can is how and where they derive the enjoyment of it.

Some say to fly a ship like you stole it. If I were to do that all of my ships would be docked up or for sale. Everything I have stolen has been sold or sits in a hangar somewhere for me to smile at. I use exactly one thing I stole, a Viator, and I've had it for almost a year now. If I lose it, like every other ship, it is lost and I am fine with that. It does not cause me to 'want' to lose it. I hope when I lose it I don't flip my hair back over my shoulder and announce, "It was stolen anyway!"

Some may confuse not caring when one finally dies with not caring at all. I think the two are very separate if they lay close together. I lost two ships the other night. My irritation had nothing to do with losing the ships and everything to do with how poorly I was flying the ships.  The ship loss is going to happen. That does not mean I writhe in glory when it does. It does not define that I had a fight. It does not mean anything other then the fact that it is now gone.

I'm also the wasteful type that gets attached to their ships. I have retired a few to a particular station because they have memories and I am a hoarder. They've not died, time after time, and their battle scared glory sits with a well deserved rest. It makes me happy and they are my ships. I don't need to lose them for them to feel used. Some do. But, not everyone.


  1. I can relate, at least when it comes to being irritated at losses, not because I lost the ship, but because I fucked up in my choice of tactics, or just did something stupid, that got me that loss.

  2. Why lose ships at all? I've been playing for more than 6 years and lost less than a dozen ships, over half of which were lost during my first year.

    Fights are won and lost before the first shot is ever fired (ie. EFT). If you can't win, or the outcome is in question, don't engage - run away. Come back only when you know you can win.

    Honor? Pride? Sportsmanship? These things have no place in a game like EVE. Winning is all that matters.

    1. Situational choice. Sometimes what you want to do will call for risks or loses as part of the over all strategy. It is a choice as well. It isn't a right one or a wrong one, just one.

    2. How does one win EVE? None of the things outlined by you apply to SOV-warfare for example, the control of space is almost entirely unrelated to the loss of ships. You can win a SOV-fight despite having far greater losses then you opponent vOv

      For me personally when I roam, a fight is about the thrill, the warrior spirit, exultation in battle, since I can't feel those things if I don't engage, running away is a poor option. The outcome of fight is irrelevant to me, the fight itself its what matters. I've lost hundreds of ships in 6 years of EVE, yet I don't feel like I lose.

      You have a very narrow concept of victory.

    3. lol OP must belong to Rooks&Kings--never engage unless victory is completely assured, right? Isn't that their thing?
      I'm not into the whole eBushido thing, either, but engaging only when victory is totally assured seems like some pretty hollow "victories" to me.

    4. Winning is not an end in itself. The people closest to valuing winning for the sake of winning are the people least likely to be validated by Eve's pvp.

    5. Hong raises a good point, where is the 'value' in 'victory' when the outcome was never in the slightest doubt?

    6. @Kaeda

      Even if the 'fight' is one-sided, the value could be in the events leading up to the fight. Eg. setting a trap. And of course, different people have different ideas about 'value'.

    7. People who say fights are over before the first shot is fired are only fighting to win. The thrill of uncertainty, of knowing your performance could win or lose big, that your clutch reaction and experience will carry you through danger, that is not what they play for. And that statement only applies to the way they play.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.

I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …