Skip to main content

Looking Through the Window

As a disclaimer, I am an outsider looking in. I've never participated in Faction Warfare. I've never wanted to. The concept of being locked into a war dec to support the NPC empires has little appeal to me.

I look into the world of Faction Warfare with mild interest. To me, Faction Warfare is the other part of low sec where we roam, looking for fights. Others live in Faction War space. I assume that they like living there because they stay there. That area of the game has particular mechanics wrapped around beacons that spawn jump gates that allow restricted access to rooms in space with warp limitations. The reasons for these rooms and these beacons are about control of a territory. Faction Warfare is a war between the NPC Empires that the players can enter into.

Players that enter into Faction Warfare automatically assume a war declaration against the players that enter Faction Warfare for the opposing faction and that faction's best friend. This opens them for legal aggression in all parts of empire space. Then the players fought for their chosen side. They had missions specific to only faction warfare members that had huge loyalty point rewards in exchange for major standings loss to the opposing empires. However, they had chosen their sides and accepted this decision.

In non-faction warfare Low Sec there once existed Static DED Complexes. These were places that people went to fight that were not gates and not stations. In Faction Warfare the exact same mechanism exists around their complex spawning. The beacons give them territory control and allows them to take systems. They are also a place to fight off of gates and stations, in open space, with warp restrictions. After all, one side is trying to control territory and it is only natural for the other to take it. But, for the longest time, the desire to own and control territory, to be a part of Faction Warfare, was the only thing encouraging people to hold these beacons. Pride. Duty. Roleplay. Fighting. They'd sit on their beacons and fight off the opposing faction.

Really the give and take of space was rather dead. It happened. Somewhat. Mostly the groups lived and clashed with each other. Until Retribution came and CCP changed how Faction Warfare paid its participants.

Retribution brought with it a restructuring of Faction Warfare. The Loyalty Point stores received bonuses. Living in Faction Warfare space brought changes and bonuses. Territory brought gains and bonuses to those that lived in them. Beacons now gave loyalty points and Tier Control dropped prices through the floor. CCP had decided that they wanted more people to be incentivized into Faction Warfare and they opened the floodgates, backed in dumpsters full of carrots and dumped them out all over Faction Warfare Space while screaming, "Come and get it!"

And come they did.

Faction Warfare turned into a place to make ISK for fighting. The general concept was amazing. Go, risk, defend, claim, fight, win money and exotic dancers. The execution however turned into go, fly around beacons, gain control until we are at Tier 5, cash out, make ISK. And that led to a resurgence of interest in Faction Warfare and a change in its general state and structure.

Instead of coming to fight, defend, role play, and participate in a piece of the story for the sake of the story and glory of the spaceships, Faction Warfare became a place to make money. A place to make good money. The balance of risk vs reward skewed towards reward as players did very little to accumulate large numbers of loyalty points.

Vov wrote a bit about Team Liquid's participation in Faction Warfare and the ISK involved in it for my technical details. http://technicallyeve.blogspot.com/2013/10/then-faction-war-got-buffed.html

And farming was born. Farming in Video Games is when players do something over and over again for a gain. They are not playing the game as a whole. They are focusing on a particular aspect of the game that is highly lucrative in terms of game currency, experience, or game items. This can be extended to doing things like attacking a particular group because they are easy and numerous to kill to an almost predictable level. In Faction Warfare that farming activity came in the area of orbiting buttons to gain loyalty points. A lot of loyalty points. The activity was simple and easy for most farming activities area such. They are not done to challenge and excite but to maximize gain.

And such the great gulf of division was created. Faction Warfare gained two sides. The side that fought in faction warfare space. This, interestingly enough, is composed of faction warfare participants and non-faction warfare participants. Both sides shoot spaceships. The Faction Warfare side tends to focus on shooting their opposing faction and sometimes neutrals. The neutrals tend to focus on shooting everyone. They are often pirates.

The second side are known as farmers. They are there for the gain. They have maximized their efficiency at gaining loyalty points. They use frigates and a handful of caution. Their ships are worth almost nothing and paid for the first time they successfully complete a beacon to orbit. Originally, they simply put on a prop module and speed tanked the NPCs in the area (did I forget to mention somewhere there is NPC involvement, kinda?) until they conquered this. CCP, when they tweaked, decided they were tired of gunless orbiting and forced the NPC to be killed. That changed little.

And so did the farmers descend upon Faction Warfare and corrupt its very essence.

The people who come to faction warfare to make money are not interested in fighting. They are interested in making money. They are not there to fight. They are not there out of loyalty to any empire or care for territory control. They change sides the moment the money is better on the other. The true professionals have alts in each militia and log on whomever will bring the most potential ISK in depending on all the factors. They have the technical science down to an art and there are a lot of them. They affect territory control as they focus on their growing loyalty point gains and wait for the tier achievements to come across.

The combatants hate them. They use warp core stabilizers and cloaking devices. They have no intent to fight. They minimize their loss and maximize their profit. They can be found everywhere. The moment a threat shows up they will leave, abandoning their work if they must. There are more beacons after all. Reshipping is a cost and an inconvenience when they can go elsewhere.

For the combatants they are a plague. A plague that brings with it the symptoms of frothing rage, anger, and Feature and Ideas posts to change cloaks and warpcore stabilizers that can challenge the AFK cloaking threads.

These two sides shall never meet. The faction warfare farmers are there to make ISK. That is their motivation. They are not there for fights. They are not there because they love their factions. They are not there to participate in a greater meaning. They are there to collect the carrots that CCP flooded the Faction Warfare zone with. They are also fully within their rights to do so. Nothing is going to make them fight until CCP changes the mechanics to make it so. When that happens they will leave. At the moment it is the most profitable activity in low sec. It requires almost no skill points to achieve and very little investment.

The ground is littered with carrots. There is no surprise when they come to eat them.

But the hunters come to hunt them. And how they rage. They run away when chased. They set their ships up to escape when pointed. They hide. They avoid. They do not give fights. Why are they in a war if they are not going to fight? Why should they have to change their fits to catch stabbed opponents? they ask.

And no one said that they have to. Who said war was all about battle? Who said everyone that participates in the war does so in a black and white fashion? Selfishness is evident in every war there has ever been. Faction Warfare farmers are playing the game as well. They are playing it in a way that the other side does not like. But that does not mean they are wrong. Not liking something has never made it wrong. Not until the rules change at least. Yes, one has to change their fits to catch them. The same goes for any part of the game. I watch haulers and battleships warp away from me all of the time. I have one point and they have a full low set of stabilizers. Those people don't want to fight me. I can only force them into a fight when they make mistakes or I can technically overcome them. Chasing Faction Warfare farmers is no different.

Faction Warfare was what before Retribution came and turned it into a source of income? Better? Worse? Different? I'll go with Different. Right now, it is full of people. It is full of people that are hard to catch. Yet, for every person that I see raging against faction warfare farmers, I flip through their killboards and see stacks and stacks of them killed. Obviously, they do die. Maybe not in the numbers that one would like but really, when does that ever happen? The farmers are not there to be entertainment for the hunters. They may become so, but at no point when they ship up and head to their money making adventures do I believe they go, "Today, I shall make a PvP focused player happy." No. They make the hunters work to get their kills and the hunters make the farmers work (a tad bit more at least) to make their ISK.

Bad or good? Healthy or not? Faction Warfare is more active and more populated then it ever was. Is that bad or good? CCP seems to like a lot of the activity. The hunters seem to have greater activity. Faction Warfare is where people are told to go to get their feet wet in PvP and to make money. Was it like that before?

Risk free! Riskless! Oh how I hear those cries. But is it true? Is it really ZERO risk? Honestly words and thoughts should go here. It is hard to step away from the emotional soapbox that has been stepped upon. But the faction warfare farmers step into low sec, under a war dec, to make their money. It is not zero risk. It has never been zero risk. Every single dead faction warfare farmer on a killboard speaks of that.

And before the farmers and other than the farmers is not the other complaint links? The linked, implanted, frigates that wait to fight and don't fight the good fight? Is not there rage against them? That they go and they fight but they fight in a 'bad' way that they assure themselves a win. Or at least, mostly assure themselves of a win. Team Liquid was running around doing their 'to catch a predator' campaign. They take a day old player in a Merlin, take his Merlin give it to a  more experienced player, go to the PLEX and wait. When someone warps in to kill that lone Merlin in the PLEX they got an ugly surprise as they were decloaked and podded.


That is how they deal with some of the more elite PvP that happens in Faction Warfare space. But did that Elite PvP exist before the farmers? Before the changes that brought Faction Warfare into the light and made the entire aspect of the game a beacon of activity? The ships in space. The kills in system. The membership of the various militias... were they like this before?

So... what is change? CCP looks at Eve from a different perspective then the player. While the war may not change Faction Warfare is now a relevant part of the game.

***

Sometimes I tread into territory that I know nothing about with the knowledge that I will say the wrong thing and have the wrong opinion. Rarely, do I look at being the Devil's Advocate but there are times when everyone finds themselves at that point. So, today, as the snow falls and my client uploads and I read twitter I decided to drop the thoughts I've been having on twitter and in game chat into a more coherent group of words.

P.S.I asked the Famous Wex Manchester to make sure my technical stuff was correct. So, blame him!

Comments

  1. One thing commonly overlooked when looking from the outside in on FW ISK-making is that the capturing of complexes is not competitive with any other non-FW ISK vehicle except that it is extremely good considering the SP requirement.
    The real profit in FW is in FW-specific L4 missions, which require a decent bit of SP to succeed at.
    The immediate buff to FW ISK was when they made the LP-store prices swing with warzone control, which was heavily exploitable with temporary wide swings of control solely for the purpose of cashing out. There was even significant amount of talk between opposing sides to cooperate for these swings. In their wisdom, CCP decided to switch the benefit of warzone control from LP-store prices to actual LP gains, meaning that doing LP-earning-things became dramatically more efficient if your side was "winning"...but notice that I didn't say dramatically more profitable. LP is still banked, and it is still, at least by the smart, cashed out in huge waves...only it's when your faction has been losing for long periods of time that your flavor of LP becomes most valuable.
    So, you have to win in order to bank LP, but you have to lose in order to maximize profit.
    Under almost no circumstances is it heavily incentivized to ever actually fight other players (although there are some nice LP gains from killing war targets, especially when they are in expensive ships). This, in my humble opinion, is the problem with the entire system. I would strongly advocate moving as much of the profit away from missioning and running complexes as possible, in the direction of making individuals, gangs, and fleets fight each other for real gains.
    Granted, if one combatant/gang/fleet and an opposing combatant/gang/fleet meet in a complex, they may fight for control over it. This happens all the time, and it is working as intended.
    But too often one side is only in it for ISK without risk, and will simply leave to find a safer area to farm.
    I'm not sure how best to penalize fleeing to make it worth it to attempt to stand your ground, but since the real LP is in missioning, which is boosted by successful plexing, I can only think it'd make sense to decouple the two. A reduction in LP gains for missioning, replaced perhaps by either more raw ISK, or some entirely different reward structure may be in order, combined with an increase in the rewards for destroying wartarget players. It might be cool to see a richly designed ribbon/medal system surrounding player kills that conveyed expanded access to the LP store. If the lowest level of access was all non-combatants had access to, the items that they could cash-in would dramatically decrease in value on the market, nerfing that style of farming, freeing up increased profit opportunities for those that actively fight their enemies.

    I dunno, not a game designer, but it really would be interesting to see how different that area of space would look if everyone was fighting like lions to maintain the ranks required to spend their LP on all the good shit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As annoying as plex farmers are, they are only viable in systems that are left relatively empty. Therefore they plex the side systems that no one really cares about as opposition heavily cuts into their LP gain.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Plexing is required to make systems vulnerable so that you can turn them over, and it's the ONLY PvE activity you can do in Eve that can be PvP at the same time. If you want to farm plexes, you fit for PvE and put on WCS. If you want to kill plexers, you fit to hunt them with 2 scrams and have at it. If you want to just fight you can camp a plex and hope someone wants to fight you too.

    Faction War requires activity in the systems to allow the system to be controlled or taken, which is 100 times better than putting up a TCU 30 systems deep in null and not living in it at all.

    The problem with Faction War is it's working as intended. The people moaning about it are the ones who cannot adapt to either choose to fit their ships to hunt the plexers or choose to fit for good fights, or choose to join FW so they can attack these guys when they aren't actively plexing.

    The plexers aren't interested in fights, they want LP, so they fit for their mission. If you fit for good fights, you're going to have to accept that you're going to have to chase some guys out of plexes that are going to get away.

    Great post, Sugar. I'm going to go get on my FW alt and grab me some LP, while simultaneously enraging my adversaries and the random pirate.

    I'm thinking putting a WCS on a Venture with a cloaking device.

    Muhahahahahaha.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Have to agree with you on this, even though switching to the pirate side of the lines has me seeing the issues a bit more clearly.

    I'd like to say switch the LP gains to ship kills over plexing, but then I imagine the whole of FW space being driven to grid lock with insta-locking gate camps.

    I like Altean's comment about linking the high level LP store items to kill rate. I'd make it inclusive though... militia must get x kills/week to unlock this item level.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th