Skip to main content

Oodles and Oodles

I received a note from Urkhan Law (who writes the blog, Lawless) that a particular rig was missing from my market in Bosena. Whoops. As it seems is often the case, I forgot that particular rig because someone else had deeply undercut me and the frigate market went stagnate after Odyssey as everyone ran to play with the new changes.

However, the note was an interesting tie into my conversation with Locke about having fits ready for people to buy. 

This actually isn't a market blog today, hence no TCS tag.

It is a question about preparation. Locke has been filling his corporation contracts with doctrine ships. That is something Van has taken upon himself for 7-2. I rarely buy from corporate contracts. I think they are a fantastic idea and I know that a lot of our membership do. I do not because I have all of the doctrine ships in my hangar. Then I have extras.

At the same time I am preparing for a Jaguar Fleet for next weekend. For these fleets I supply the Jaguar's and the ones that live are handed back to me at the end of the fleet. I buy and fit them and hand them out because Jaguars (to my confusion) are not the first ship that most people grab. I must be reasonable and understand (somehow) that most people will not have one ready (and that some may fit them to armor but we will ignore that particular evil, today).

Then, as I ran my Jump Freighter to Jita to do a suddenly stock due to an OP where the FC wanted things people might not have in the deployment station, I started to ponder preparation. 

One of the things about not living in high sec is that preparation is a very important thing. Early on, in THC2, we often spent Sundays stocking our hangars from the weeks losses. Ender did the jump freighter runs and he wasn't going to do them every day. Most of our security statuses were rather low although in those days we all hovered above -5 (except LR).

My early training program with Diz was crafted to train me through both armor and shield tanking. It never occurred to me that everyone did not do that. Part of my early candy themed naming convention was built around identifying my shield and armor ships. It seems that I am not bright enough to name them things like "shield" or "armor". I always assumed ships needed names and those names were supposed to be fun and interesting... I did learn later.

My deployment hangar has 40 fit ships and 34 empty hulls. I consider this perfectly normal. I can fly every doctrine that we have, every sub doctrine, or an appropriate support ship. I have backups of everything and multiples of anything light weight or that I enjoy flying (I only have 11 fit Jaguars with me, so there). I do have a personal tendency to overbuy. I assume that I will die every time I undock so I often buy 5 of whatever I am going to be flying if the price tag is under or around a hundred million ISK.

I don't expect everyone to have forty ships ready to fly. In many ways my hangar represents the PvPer I'd like to be vs the PvPer that I am. I do think that a backup of anything regularly or commonly flown that is not super expensive makes sense. I should add that this is for fleet situations. Solo PvP runs after the rules of the pilot and no one else. Being able to reship is important and from a small gang perspective it is vital.

7-2, like THC2, reships on the fly. The fleet may start out with T1 frigates and switch to a Blops fleet before settling into whatever the FC calls for the night. Each FC also has their own flavors of fits and I've simply accumulated what I need. It makes it easy for me to forget that not everyone is me/us and flies this way. Listening to others adventures in stocking, fitting, and supplying themselves and corporations is fascinating.

I may be a spaceship hoarder.

Comments

  1. When I was running the corporate contract market for my corp I had the leadership thank me many times for starting it because inevitably during a form up someone needed a doctrine ship and I would have one on contracts ready.
    This lead to our fleets being much deadlier in their cohesiveness vs having vulnerabilities for a bit of kitchen sink from those whom were unprepared.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th