Skip to main content

Keeping Up With the Jovians

Someone made a comment towards my corporation's tendency to fly T1 ships a bit ago. It was not complimentary. It was not a pointed insult. It was more along the lines of being past or to good to spend that much time in T1, sub-battleship hulls. The initial urge was to respond back with neat, pointed remarks about how they are wrong and why we fly what we fly. But, that would be useless. Justification, while it feels fantastic, rarely works. Also, our effectiveness was not in doubt. It was that the hulls are cheap, basic hulls.

Most of us play Eve because of spaceships. It may be the technical play of them or it may be the mindless screaming of, "Yay! Woooo!" But, we play for the spaceships. I lusted for a Naga for a long time. I saw one once and I fell deeply in love with the hull. I now have three and I have had exactly two chances to fly it in the nine months I have been able to fly it. But, I love the hull. I also have a Rokh and I can't even fly it. I love the hull.

The hull is interesting. It can be the most expensive part of the ship or the least. My last two T1 cruiser losses the hull was 1/4 of the cost of the loss. The rest was in modules, drones, and ammunition. The balance is even more amusing with a T1 frigate. These are the ships that you can obtain within hours of entering the game. Some are given to you for free even. Other's are only delayed by the acquisition of ISK. Skills are another conversation.

Part of the rebalancing and tiericide attempts was to revitalize underutilized hulls. It brought cruisers into the light where I think they belong. As the casual, daily seen combat ship the cruiser makes sense to me. However, the accessibility and relative simplance of cruisers cause some to look down on them. Eve is a game of lateral specialization and small vertical improvements. Yet, in the conflict of spaceships vs spaceships the small differences are what give the edge.

I myself am not prone to undock in a T1 cruiser. My undock sequence tends to be Jaguar-> Cynabal -> Talos. Vagabond is now slipping in there and depending on the situation interceptors will pop in. I fly what I fly because of my flying style. I like fast ships and agility. The Talos is my go to DPS ship. I am going to buy a stack of Sleipnir and add them to my PvP stack. I don't pick ships off of price but I tend to pick pricier ships due those being the ships that fly the way that I like. I don't pick them because of price.

A lot of my focus and the focus of my social circles is in the utility of the hull. We aim to fly anything because we need to face situations with the best counters we can. Each pilot retains their personal choices and favorites. Why they choose them varies. Some do care about prive. The PvP habit burns into the wallet. Others choose through what works for them. Sometimes it is about what they want to do or what task they choose. Why someone flies a hull they fly varies. When someone shakes the station an amazing amount of stuff may fall out from Slashers to Bhaalgorns.

But most often it is cruisers and T1 cruisers at that. They are versatile, useful, capable, inexpensive, and just useful in almost every situation. We have entire doctrines wrapped around T1 hulls due to their psychological engageability to opposing fleets. T1 hulls can be seen through the game. When I use T1 I separate it from Faction. When battleships are reached, for PvP combat the step up is often a faction ship over a T2 ship. The faction ships are also notable in every level of sub-cap as being an improvement over their T1 counterparts in ability and price.

But, T1 cruisers are remarkably effective. That is why I find it fascinating that people look down upon them. The "Oh, you are flying T1 cruisers? Are you poor?" or one may be called a scrub for flying in a cheap ship. The Urban Dictionary defines a scrub through the use of descriptive language from the artist group, TLC. The general definition is that a scrub has poor finances, an inability to use safety equipment in a motorized vehicle, and a propensity to loud communications with strangers who catches the attention of the scrub. None of this appears to mesh well with the flexibility and usability of T1 cruiser hulls and T1 hulls in general over more faction or T2 hulls.

While 7-2 points out in its application that we fly expensive things, it is because we do. There are corporations that dedicate themselves to flying cheap things. There are ones that dedicate themselves to flying expensive things. Having a theme or a focus is normal. I simply find it odd when one goes, "Oh you are always flying cheap hulls." What is done with the ship is ignored. The only thing noticed and pointed at is the price of the ship. "Sure you killed all of their battleships, and their T2 hulls, but you won't stop flying those cheap T1 hulls." For all the strangeness in Eve the devaluation of a successful fight due to the lack of fancy spaceship bodies confuses me the most (after smack talk).

Hulls are the only exterior symbol of relative wealth. Without ship scanning no one can see your modules. They can surmise during PvP when the various module stats kick in. No one can see your wallet. But there is a tangible level of impressiveness when what is labeled a 'shiny' hull enters the field. Beyond the excitement and lip smacking drooling of wanting to kill it certain hulls cause people to stop and rethink. No one knows how good the pilot or the fit is. The hull starts the decision making process and the thoughts and assumptions about the person flying.

It works both ways. The simple hull can be underestimated. The fancy hull over estimated. Flying the hull doesn't say a damn thing about the person. It is what they do with it and quite often the ones who look furthest down their nose at cheap items are the ones not undocking due to hull cost. If the cost of a hull causes you to not engage in your chosen activity I would think that the cost of the hull is a detriment.

Comments

  1. Urban dictionary... Full of crap as usual.

    I don't when or how "scrub" first came into use that way but I'm pretty sure I first heard it playing sandlot and little league baseball years before Street Fighter II was out.

    I like fast, agile, cheap hulls too but my definition of cheap is probably a little different than most players'. I mostly fly Manticores, Cheetahs, Prowlers, Tengus and of course dirt cheap Vigils though most of the Vigil alts will be flying Prowlers soon too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ssshhhhh.... you're giving away our secrets.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …