Skip to main content

Alea Iacta Est

The Nosy Gamer said that alea iacta est had to be used at least once by everyone for Rubicon. I decided to take the lazy way out and use it as the blog title the next time I posted about the Rubicon Expansion.

I wanted to test the Siphon when I came home the first day of the SiSi update. I wound up being kept an hour and a half late at work which made my entire evening a bit of a mess. I spent most of the time doing logistics but I logged in to at least touch the changes. Mostly, I frantically did logistics. Moving the entire corporation and all the things that make us said corporation is amazingly exhausting and non ending. Then, as I patched and updated I realized that the account I planned to set up the POS to test the Siphon with is not mirrored over onto her new account and the old one is inactive. Sugar is behind by huge chunks of skill points. She has 40 million now. I'm also no longer in THC2 and seeing the corp ticker makes me somewhat homesick.

Interceptors are scary fast. Entering warp is almost instant. The graphics have been sped up so the ship roars towards its location at full speed. I also took out a Cynabal and it warps and enters warp much faster. Very noticeable and pleasant feeling changes.

Maybe interceptors are too fast. I'm sure we'll figure it out. Just to fly Interceptors are amazing right now with the speed. Frigates will warp before all the things and land before the rest of all of the things. Blockade Runners now do ridiculous warps.

What I did notice was a lot of UI changes. The look and feel of the UI is different. The skill book icon has changed. I really don't like it. It is now a dull, blah gray. It was a vibrant yellowish orange before. The completed skills have a star in the blah gray book.


The show info is also different. The green box is "what you need to command this ship" and the other weird symbol thing is the 'mastery' things. Is this when I start a protest and go "I'm mistress of my ship?" while frothing at the mouth and ranting that my gender is not represented? I don't actually care one bit and only thought of that as I started typing. It would be amusing as it came up. Mostly, I thought about it because I don't like the term 'mastery' plastered all over the place. It is kind of overdone.


Very interesting was the tooltip popup over ships in the market.


There are a lot of UI changes coming in. It is neater but at the same time some of it is much more blah. A lot of gray on gray on gray on gray. It is neat but so simple as to look unpolished. I like the pretty artwork. Maybe I'll change my UI colors some. I don't know. There was a comment of, "They are spending resources on the UI instead of fixing X?" I pointed out that I suspect CCP developers have specializations. Not every developer is going to be able to work on every aspect of the game code. The person working on the UI may not be able to rewrite POS code.

I've also been engaged in some disagreement about the interceptor changes. There is some commentary that frigates and interceptors will be able to tackle things without a pause from now on. That a prober will be able to probe a nanoing battlecruiser for instance and drop an interceptor on it before the battlecruiser can go. If I move past the fact that there are no more battlecruisers in Eve I ask a question that is beyond my personal level of self interest.

I've heard a lot of good and bad about them. I hear a lot of, "I won't be able to escape being scanned and tackled by an interceptor anymore." My response was at what point does having the right tools for the job make it okay to get the job done? Eve is not kind to small groups at all and that is painful to those of us that enjoy that lifestyle. Yet, the game is more than one group. When is bringing the correct counter okay? When is it okay for someone to bring the resources onto the field to achieve their goal which is tackling the nano ship. I know that everyone wants ships to feed down their pewpew grinder. I'd love every tackle ship to fly straight into my guns and die. However, if someone puts the resources out to achieve the goal, the goal is achieved. If Eve is balanced around "I don't want to die ever because I like to take fights that are hard" what balance would that actually create?

Some people think the new missile module is amazing. Others are calling it crap. That may mean its balanced. I don't know. I'm going to go to bed.

There is a lot of yay and a lot of nay going on. Lots of videos and screenshots are up for those who do not do the test server thing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …