Skip to main content

A Well Rounded Triangle


I can now Oracle. With my T2 pulse lasers I undocked in a ship that I have liked for quite a while but never flown. I started with Minmatar back when Minmatar is what you started out with for PvP. At this time, I can now fly the Tornado, Naga, Talos, and Oracle with T2 weapons. I'm rather pleased with that.

However, we don't often used 'attack' battlecruisers, once known as tier3 battlecruisers. We don't often use battlecruisers at all anymore. Two years ago Eve was battlecruisers online. Now seeing one in a fleet is almost exciting and slightly out of place.

I've been mulling over the topic. I gave up battlecruisers for the most part last December. When the battlecruiser nerf was happening I was doing some reading into why I disagreed with the nerf. At the time I looked into what battlecruiser was. If I am going to make arguments into the void I might as well try to do a coherent job with them. Onwards to Wikipedia.

Battlecruiser
A battlecruiser, or battle cruiser, was a large capital ship built in the first half of the 20th century. They were similar in size and cost to a battleship, and typically carried the same kind of heavy guns, but battlecruisers generally carried less armour and were faster.
When CCP committed tiericide on battlecruisers they split them into two types. Combat and attack. Combat battlecruisers were beaten with a nerf bat until they laid down and stopped undocking. Attack battlecruisers were touched a bit but for the most part left alone. After the change the attack battlecruiser turned closer into something that matched the definition of what a battlecruiser was.


Large guns, glass cannons, reasonably agile, they are really a true battlecruiser while the common battlecruiser is more a heavy cruiser. Not that it matters. Obsessing over the definitions of the words is a bit silly in this game. I admit, I cannot resist and do it anyway.

I like the attack battlecruisers for the most part. I find the weaknesses of large guns to be very uncomfortable to deal with. Everything I see I think about how bad it would be if I got under its tracking. Also, working with lasers is new. They have such small areas between when they hit things and when they flash lights across them. Growing up in the world of projectile turrets it is something that matters much more. Another bit of situational awareness checking in. I feel a bit helpless in them instead of amazing. It may be the hours I have logged into my Jaguar.


I have plugged in Zealot (aka Amarr Cruiser V) as well. I am pondering spending some time in Amarr interceptors after the change.

Now I have hte holy trinity of turrets. I am a triangle of effectiveness. Or something.

Comments

  1. You are the Tri-Force. Leave luck to heaven...

    ReplyDelete
  2. But but triangles aren't rounded, they're pointy! :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Surely the Rupture is the definition of 'triangle of effectiveness'?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th