Skip to main content

A Well Rounded Triangle


I can now Oracle. With my T2 pulse lasers I undocked in a ship that I have liked for quite a while but never flown. I started with Minmatar back when Minmatar is what you started out with for PvP. At this time, I can now fly the Tornado, Naga, Talos, and Oracle with T2 weapons. I'm rather pleased with that.

However, we don't often used 'attack' battlecruisers, once known as tier3 battlecruisers. We don't often use battlecruisers at all anymore. Two years ago Eve was battlecruisers online. Now seeing one in a fleet is almost exciting and slightly out of place.

I've been mulling over the topic. I gave up battlecruisers for the most part last December. When the battlecruiser nerf was happening I was doing some reading into why I disagreed with the nerf. At the time I looked into what battlecruiser was. If I am going to make arguments into the void I might as well try to do a coherent job with them. Onwards to Wikipedia.

Battlecruiser
A battlecruiser, or battle cruiser, was a large capital ship built in the first half of the 20th century. They were similar in size and cost to a battleship, and typically carried the same kind of heavy guns, but battlecruisers generally carried less armour and were faster.
When CCP committed tiericide on battlecruisers they split them into two types. Combat and attack. Combat battlecruisers were beaten with a nerf bat until they laid down and stopped undocking. Attack battlecruisers were touched a bit but for the most part left alone. After the change the attack battlecruiser turned closer into something that matched the definition of what a battlecruiser was.


Large guns, glass cannons, reasonably agile, they are really a true battlecruiser while the common battlecruiser is more a heavy cruiser. Not that it matters. Obsessing over the definitions of the words is a bit silly in this game. I admit, I cannot resist and do it anyway.

I like the attack battlecruisers for the most part. I find the weaknesses of large guns to be very uncomfortable to deal with. Everything I see I think about how bad it would be if I got under its tracking. Also, working with lasers is new. They have such small areas between when they hit things and when they flash lights across them. Growing up in the world of projectile turrets it is something that matters much more. Another bit of situational awareness checking in. I feel a bit helpless in them instead of amazing. It may be the hours I have logged into my Jaguar.


I have plugged in Zealot (aka Amarr Cruiser V) as well. I am pondering spending some time in Amarr interceptors after the change.

Now I have hte holy trinity of turrets. I am a triangle of effectiveness. Or something.

Comments

  1. You are the Tri-Force. Leave luck to heaven...

    ReplyDelete
  2. But but triangles aren't rounded, they're pointy! :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Surely the Rupture is the definition of 'triangle of effectiveness'?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th

CSMX - Post #20

Summer is here and CCP is very much out of the office. Sion made a good point in wondering why everyone leaves Iceland when it has its best weather. What it means is that all is mostly quiet on the dev blog front. There are some things happening but the dev blogs and news announcements have not yet happened. The skill points were delivered on Tuesday  so yay for unallocated skill points. Over in CSM chat, there has been a lot of back and forth about sov and measuring the impact and success of things so far. I can say that CCP and the CSM are watching it. The pros and cons are coming in pretty hot and heavy. Some are being looked at now. Some have to see how things are going and if and how the direction needs to be tweaked. In my corner, I'm starting to gather things together. The summit is in seven or so weeks. In between then and now I need to gather up my question list and write down a few topics of discussion. I'm starting now because I have personal vacation at the end

CSM9 - Day 140

The week has been the Summer Summit for CSM9. That did not mean that the world stopped for us. Things in Eve moved forward because we have the Oceanas release coming on the 22nd. CCP Fozzie has released a small interceptor tweak . Interdictors are also being retouched for fine detailing. The thread about it is up. This is not a rebalance where the ships gain complete new roles and identities. This is focused on fine tuning. I have spoken up about the fact that the situation where Titans were being bumped out of POS shields was not acceptable to me. I’ve voiced my disagreement as have other players. CCP Fozzie has posted changes to cyno usage outside of POS force fields . I am not fully happy with this change. I am happy that it will stop the Titan bumping issue. I am not happy with not being able to light cynos on shields. I feel that it will negatively affect tackling ships hugging force fields and I have expressed that. The topic came up in one of our Summit Meetings with CCP Fo