Skip to main content

Security Status for PewPew

No matter how cool an idea is, it is first faced with the hurdle of making sense. Often ideas are proposed and the first reaction of the listener is to rattle off a dozen exploits without even blinking. That does not stop an idea from being cool but it does make it very clear that cool ideas and good ideas and bad ideas can all share the same moment in reality without shattering space time.

Tags4Sec has excited my sector of space. The discussions are swirling in all directions but in general we are waiting. Waiting to see what the spawns will be like. That will truly tell us the viability of it before anything else does.

But, inside of the speculation a common question pops up, "shooting each other for sec gain". It is an oft requested problem and it did come up at fanfest. The issue is not that it is not a good idea. The issue is that it is a highly abusable idea.

Enter our friendly neighborhood ex-anti-pirate - now fully pirate, Altaen:
"If they could somehow tie the sec-gain to the value of the kill, similar to FW LP gains and normal bounty payouts it'd be totally doable. So long as they make the value of kills needed to go from -10 to zero significantly more expensive than the tag process, it'd be balanced."
In Faction Warfare, killing someone on the opposite side nets the person a loyalty point gain. This was abused terribly last year after the faction warfare buffs. However, it was nuked down to something reasonable  It means that this mechanics of decision making is already in the game. If it was applied to security status, would it provide a reasonable way for the gain to be made? The value of kill dictating the amount of reward bacon has already proven successful in areas such as Faction Warfare and Bounties.

Enter Sard Caid, resident solo PvPer who live streams and such things:
"I'd argue that sec gain should be equivalent for players from -5.0 to -10.0, and should be dependent on the value of the kill alone.  An outlaw's an outlaw, and I don't feel like there should be a difference killing a -5.0 sec status rifter jock versus a -10.0 sec status rifter jock.
Also, they don't have to make sec gain from outlaws huge - if you made it equivalent to a faction rat, it's like killing 2 normal spawns of that size at once.  Scale gain similar to that with an appropriate value of the kill and sec for outlaw kills is good to go."
I got all excited at these good ideas. They seemed good to me. I certainly couldn't come up with something like that.  I asked if they minded if I dragged it out of the forums and shared it and I was told okay.

Sard did raise another good point. It is a valid question.
"Why the fuck would people want security status for fighting outlaws?  As a generalist lowsec PvPer I wouldn't complain about the effect as it helps keep my sec status up, but from the viewpoint of an anti-pirate it's really not much of a reward."
Altaen was there to the rescue as Mr. I killed all things that were pirate and kinda pirate and had p's in their name:
"Well, from the (former) anti-pirate perspective, it is pretty annoying having your sec-status tank every week from killing non-outlaw pirates and having to spend hours ratting it up so you can get safely to and from market and help your alliance during wars, etc.
But from that same perspective, there are WAAAY more non-outlaw targets around than outlaw targets, so I imagine it wouldn't help much."
That was an interesting point. The idea has a greater cool and 'this makes sense' factor then a usability factor. But, when it comes to features, what matters the most? Many groups have a policy to only shoot reds (outlaw meaning -5 or lower sec) and those that first complete the aggressive action. They do not lose security status for this. However, if they also gained some security status it might not be a bad thing. Many, many people enter the game wanting to be the vigilantly good guy. They are often swiftly corrupted to the sweetness of the other side...s

The loss of security status is a major inhibitor to many people. It absolutely confuses me. Security status, in my part of the world is something that you lose and gain. It causes inconvenience (high sec restrictions) and it causes some annoyances (gateguns don't care that you are being attacked) but it is not an inhibitor. But I will write about the good and evil conceptual attitudes in another post. This one is just for this idea.

Also, I learned that Altaen kills everything.  Also, also, the best blog post is the one other people wrote!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …