Skip to main content

Security Status for PewPew

No matter how cool an idea is, it is first faced with the hurdle of making sense. Often ideas are proposed and the first reaction of the listener is to rattle off a dozen exploits without even blinking. That does not stop an idea from being cool but it does make it very clear that cool ideas and good ideas and bad ideas can all share the same moment in reality without shattering space time.

Tags4Sec has excited my sector of space. The discussions are swirling in all directions but in general we are waiting. Waiting to see what the spawns will be like. That will truly tell us the viability of it before anything else does.

But, inside of the speculation a common question pops up, "shooting each other for sec gain". It is an oft requested problem and it did come up at fanfest. The issue is not that it is not a good idea. The issue is that it is a highly abusable idea.

Enter our friendly neighborhood ex-anti-pirate - now fully pirate, Altaen:
"If they could somehow tie the sec-gain to the value of the kill, similar to FW LP gains and normal bounty payouts it'd be totally doable. So long as they make the value of kills needed to go from -10 to zero significantly more expensive than the tag process, it'd be balanced."
In Faction Warfare, killing someone on the opposite side nets the person a loyalty point gain. This was abused terribly last year after the faction warfare buffs. However, it was nuked down to something reasonable  It means that this mechanics of decision making is already in the game. If it was applied to security status, would it provide a reasonable way for the gain to be made? The value of kill dictating the amount of reward bacon has already proven successful in areas such as Faction Warfare and Bounties.

Enter Sard Caid, resident solo PvPer who live streams and such things:
"I'd argue that sec gain should be equivalent for players from -5.0 to -10.0, and should be dependent on the value of the kill alone.  An outlaw's an outlaw, and I don't feel like there should be a difference killing a -5.0 sec status rifter jock versus a -10.0 sec status rifter jock.
Also, they don't have to make sec gain from outlaws huge - if you made it equivalent to a faction rat, it's like killing 2 normal spawns of that size at once.  Scale gain similar to that with an appropriate value of the kill and sec for outlaw kills is good to go."
I got all excited at these good ideas. They seemed good to me. I certainly couldn't come up with something like that.  I asked if they minded if I dragged it out of the forums and shared it and I was told okay.

Sard did raise another good point. It is a valid question.
"Why the fuck would people want security status for fighting outlaws?  As a generalist lowsec PvPer I wouldn't complain about the effect as it helps keep my sec status up, but from the viewpoint of an anti-pirate it's really not much of a reward."
Altaen was there to the rescue as Mr. I killed all things that were pirate and kinda pirate and had p's in their name:
"Well, from the (former) anti-pirate perspective, it is pretty annoying having your sec-status tank every week from killing non-outlaw pirates and having to spend hours ratting it up so you can get safely to and from market and help your alliance during wars, etc.
But from that same perspective, there are WAAAY more non-outlaw targets around than outlaw targets, so I imagine it wouldn't help much."
That was an interesting point. The idea has a greater cool and 'this makes sense' factor then a usability factor. But, when it comes to features, what matters the most? Many groups have a policy to only shoot reds (outlaw meaning -5 or lower sec) and those that first complete the aggressive action. They do not lose security status for this. However, if they also gained some security status it might not be a bad thing. Many, many people enter the game wanting to be the vigilantly good guy. They are often swiftly corrupted to the sweetness of the other side...s

The loss of security status is a major inhibitor to many people. It absolutely confuses me. Security status, in my part of the world is something that you lose and gain. It causes inconvenience (high sec restrictions) and it causes some annoyances (gateguns don't care that you are being attacked) but it is not an inhibitor. But I will write about the good and evil conceptual attitudes in another post. This one is just for this idea.

Also, I learned that Altaen kills everything.  Also, also, the best blog post is the one other people wrote!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Summer in Iceland - Day Six

It is the final day and we have moved past Sion's shark consumption. We left Cafe Loki and just strolled back through town. I wandered in and out of stores looking for soft gloves or socks. There are lots of gloves, socks, scarves, hats, and etc all over the place but most of them are made of wool and are as harsh and scratchy as anything I have ever seen. I wanted something soft and silky and amazing and I didn't find that which is okay. The general game plan was to find this Ice Cream place across the street from CCP. It seems that they make their ice cream daily and it is the most amazing ice cream ever. So, we head to this ice cream place which is also near a grocery store and some museums. We go in and Corbexx orders some terrible concoction of salted peanuts and some candy that I hate. He said it was delicious. I was stuck staring at the flavors and not knowing what anything was because I'm illiterate in Iceland. I also have an ongoing problem with catching the