Skip to main content

Odyssey Test Time: A Bit More Poking

I decided to play on SiSi some more today. I won't have time over the weekend to keep up with the feedback that will flood in once everyone is off. And I have a stack of serious (aka bad) posts I may try to finish up.

It is a lean, green, 95% of what I want it to be machine. I'm happy to take what I can get. If that means green camouflage and sacrificing one medium energy neutralizer II for a small energy neutralizer II, I'll deal with it. Beyond that, my duel large shield extended, 8 high spot, nano cane is back in business. It is now three times more expensive but damn, it feels good to have it (mostly)back.

Odyssey. The undock button does abort your undock as a commentor was kind enough to point out yesterday. I'd never have figured that out I suspect. Currently, the button option just goes away once the unload screen starts. However, aborting undock is much smoother now.

Off I went to do more ratting. I have done more belt ratting playing with the changes than I have done in game in months. I found another tags4sec NPC on the second belt I looked at in a .03 system. That netted me a recruiter tag. The spawns seem common so far. The bounty and sec gain is comparable to a faction NPC. They won't seem as common with other people looking for them but the over all feel is easy to find is there.

My security gain. The big ones are tags4sec NPCs. The first one was a faction destroyer.

  • 2013.05.08 22:28 0.3450% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain
  • 2013.05.08 22:58 0.5750% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain
  • 2013.05.08 23:16 0.5750% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain
  • 2013.05.09 03:03 0.4600% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain
  • 2013.05.09 03:12 0.0244% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain
  • 2013.05.09 19:37 0.3450% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain
  • 2013.05.09 19:46 0.0216% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain
  • 2013.05.09 19:57 0.0230% Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain

New question: Instead of chaining belts should we now clear them to encourage tags4sec NPC's to appear?

The jump gate effects are still amazing for me. It just sucks me into the game and makes me a bit excited. Eve really is a pretty game and deserves pretty effects.

My next task was to go and look at an ice belt. This is how the icons look in space. This also shows my random issue of blue to white wrecks. I left the scanner running to see how I like it. So far, I like it. It feels like more stuff is going on around me.

To use the system scanner from my HUD the interface is nice. I like it better than the scroll menus  It will become visual reminders soon. The sites exist in space and you can warp to them from space. If you want to warp to them from the scanner menu you have to hit the scan button to get them to come up. It does not automatically place them in the scan window even though it has obviously scanned them in space. Should it?

New ice belts are visually smaller. They are more clumps of ice vs belts of ice.  With that done I logged on my scanning alt and off I went into 0.1 space to see if I could find a Radar or Mag site (whatever they are called now).

I launched in the pinpoint formation. Once the muscle memory relearns the movement is easier. I keep screwing up because moving the formation closer or further apart is shift+alt. While shift + one probe moves the single one around. Anyway, lots of mistakes, nothing huge. Once I found it, off I went! I watched my Legion's guns retract as it warped. Such a cool, small detail I normally don't see because of cloak.

I automatically assumed I'd have to fight NPCs and then remembered, nope.  Also, instead of round cans the sites are now white crosses.

Okay it is pretty and all but you have to click on it and go to open to get the mini game up. I took pictures because I have no idea what is going on. I'm just clicking things. I managed to fail it once I found the button that gives loot. I am fully confused as to what I am doing other than clicking everything. It seems if I manage to make more than one of the 'attackable' button things active none of them work anymore. Sometimes the buttons didn't light up when clicked.

A whole lot of fail. You can try again I guess. I haven't managed to do anything but fail each time. I can only assume I am terrible at whatever it is that you are doing. I really don't know. After an hour and dozens of failures I started to lose interest in this. I have no idea what I am doing and what it is supposed to be doing but nothing has jettisoned out of anything.

Frustrated  I logged off. The mini-game is still buggy. Sometimes the little round things don't highlight and it turns out it was a virus or whatever. Not in love with hacking. I'm kind of untrilled over spending an hour clicking at something and not getting anything. Hopefully others are having better success and it is just me. I kept coming back to it over the afternoon and kept failing. I need to get TCS stocked for the weekend so I'll keep up with the threads and hopefully learn what I am doing wrong.

Maybe it is the new modules or skills?


  1. i have the same damn problem....besides isn`t the whole doal of the minigame to find that DATA CORE thing and hack it? i curently have virus strength do u increase that? only bonuses i saw are for virus coherence?
    Once i find that yellow/orange box named data core...what do i do next? if u click on it nothing happens...this is really confusing and frustrating...

  2. In case you hadn't seen this thread:

    CCP Bayesian: "Thanks for all the feedback. As most people have realised this is far from the finished version! The current method of access is incredibly temporary as is the ending of the hacking. As most people have noticed the new Hacking and Archaeology sites are only hooked up on a few archaeology sites. This is all massively WIP at the moment in the version on Sisi and we're much further on than you see currently.

    We're hoping to update and run a mass test next week. There will be a devblog coming out on Monday explaining the hacking mechanics in more depth, with further devblogs to follow talking about the scattering of the site contents and the rebalance of the exploration sites in general."

    1. I had not yet seen that. Thank you. I was drowning in frustration.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log


Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th