Skip to main content

As I Lay Down my ISK

I was speaking with someone who has been away from the game for the last six or so months. He was wondering if he could come to THC2. We had a chat about that and as we discussed ships I told him that one of the most basic necessities would be skills to fly a cruiser and the ability to T2 shield or T2 armor tank said cruiser with guns right behind it.

"I thought pirates were more into frigates?"

I blinked at that. My own personal taste in frigates has been hard to indulge in low sec. Of the 831 things on my killboard 285 have been killed in frigates. 8 of those kills have been with a T1 frigate (Rifter) 8 with a T1 frigate (Incursus during a fleet of Incursi) and the rest have been with T2 frigates/Interceptors. Most of those kills have happened post Retribution now that frigates are able to mitigate gategun and station gun damage. This is all because Molden Heath is not faction warfare based low security space and the group that I flew with, until Retribution, were a battlecruiser heavy group. Post retribution, cruisers are a more common sight. However, it was never about frigates.

I consider us as much pirate as the next group of low sec PvPers. We are not pirate roleplayers. We are a solo (except me) and small gang fighters who live in low sec because low sec is where we like to be. However, I've never limited pirate to frigate.

Now, frigate fighting is its own play style  The ships are small and fast, the fights frantic and edged by fine degrees of skill (both skill point and player skill). They also have the lovely side effect of being cost effective. Cost effective is good. Not everyone enjoys making ISK in Eve. For many, it is a necessary evil. For others, pixil money makes us happy.

But ISK is the great motivator in Eve. From agreements that turn nullsec into a series of treaties to target choices in a fleet due to killboard efficiency. However, we all perceive value differently. For some, being able to afford what they want right now is all that they care for and others wish to create vast projects and complex economic empires. The two both hinge upon ISK.

As much as ISK is the great motivator it is also the greatest aversion. Miura Bull, a fantastic frigate pilot wrote some thoughts on upscaling into pirate frigates. Even veteran pilots who have been around since before the sun was born such as Kirith Kodachi admits to feeling the pressure that ISK places upon their ship decisions.

One of the lies of ISK is that it whispers to us of value due to price alone. However, value as in cost  is also based upon supply and demand as well as rarity. Some items are valuable only because they are uncommon not because they are good. Other items have a high value simply do to their cost of creation. Because Eve does not spawn spaceships out of the void for us the cost of making that ship is added to the cost of acquiring that ship and acquisition does not always mean going down to the nearest dealer and picking up a new ride.

Are people stupid for flying expensive things? When someone upgrades a ship, to one much more expensive, to deal with a situation is it because they cannot deal with the situation in a smaller ship or because they decided to change their tactics? And is it so terrible of them to do so? Is placing an expensive ship on the field some type of insult or admission of inadequacy?

I see it often, disparagement against more expensive hulls. Yet, a faction or pirate hull does not the pilot a god make.

I will be investing in Hurricane Fleet Issues after the expansion. It will be my go to DPS ship as it once was before. And yes it will be expensive compared to some other ships. Some people may call me various slurs for bringing a faction ship to the field. Or, more likely, from some of the things I have seen of late they will.

I guess I will bring disappointment down upon others. I've tried to play the game where I always did what I was told to do and flew what I was told to fly without any personal input  It is not to say that I will reject fleet doctrines when they come but if we are going to kitchen sink it up I will undock something that costs some ISK and I will feel no shame as I do it. I am not bringing the ship to the fight because I have to use it otherwise I cannot possibly engage, I am bringing it because that is what I want to fly of the things that I can fly properly.


  1. I think it's important to distinguish between cheap, and cost effective - frigates being a prime example. While they are cheap to lose, if you don't achieve your objective, they aren't cost effective. Same applies to any other class of ship.

  2. This is pretty much why we are most on our guard when we find a wormhole to low sec: If a fleet comes in from low sec, they're usually very good pilots in very good ships, so we don't want to get caught with our proverbial pants down. Outside of factional warfare, I've found that low sec ship choices are pretty similar to WH ship choices, except for obvious differences in fitting and a greater fondness for capital ships in low.

    Which reminds me, I need to kickstart my low sec frigate pilot again. I still have a lot to learn about that.

  3. The only Pirate corp which really is 'All Frigates All The Time' is R1FTA and even that should be taken with a pinch of salt. When I was in R1FTA we were often mocked by the honourable members of RANSM and other pirate entities for our lack of ever 'upshipping' in order to fight others. But often this was merely because R1FTA pilots really are frigate junkies. Kaesa wrote a great blogpost about precisely that once which I would link except I'm on my phone :/ However just because the frigate is often the go to ship out of choice it doesn't mean members can't and won't ship up if and when the situation presents itself. Why since his return to the Heath even the glorious leader of the Screaming Hayabusa Dread Captain Miura Bull Himself has been seen scouring the spacelanes in SFI's which rather lends itself nicely to the whole theme of your post here ;)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log


Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th