Skip to main content

Eve Online Fanfest 2013: Dust 514, Planetary Conquest, and Low Sec

I regretted not going to the Dust 514 Keynote when I learned that they officially announced what we all knew, that Dust 514 Planetary Conquest was coming to Molden Heath.  I decided to correct my knowledge gap and go to the Dust 514 sessions that involved Planetary Conquest and see what I could learn.

I know very little about Dust and this is not about Dust. It is about what Dust will do to Non-Faction Warfare Low Sec. I want Dust to succeed but I am not personally interested in it. It is a first person shooter and all of the fascinating gameplay does not take away from the fact that its run around and shoot things in a first person view. The only time I am sucked into First Person views is exploration games like Skyrim and Fallout.

Anyway, I was there to hear about Molden Heath. I sat with Ueberlisk. I am pretty sure that we were the only Molden Heath residents there.

All of the temperate planets are going to become controllable  They will be randomly split into 5-24 districts. These districts can be claimed by Dust corporations. There, they can build infrastructures. They will have three types.

  • Production Facilities
  • Cargo Holds
  • Research Labs

Currently only Faction Warfare interacts with Dust. The changes will allow the Eve side of the Dust Corporation/Alliance to receive bonuses to Planetary Interaction on the Planet and Player Owned Star-bases anchored on the moons around the planet.
  • Production Facilities - Will Increase PI
  • Cargo Holds - Decrease Manufacturing time at POS
  • Research Lab - Decrease POS Fuel Usage
I was not sure if these things were big enough carrots. I went to the Round Table for this and asked. The Devs said that they can adjust the reward up if they need to.

My concern was this: They are asking for corporations and alliances to move into low sec and anchor a POS to receive these rewards. Molden Heath is full of pretty aggressive residents. All the POCOs are owned. If someone wants the PI reward they will have to take the POCOs. The Devs felt this was great because it creates conflict. I agree but my question is, is the increase enough for people to want to deal with taking a POCO and defending the POCO constantly? And if the increase was great enough that the answer is yes will it just be yet another case of null sec powers rolling through and stomping over everyone else and controlling another resourse.

I cannot see the manufacturing time increase to be enough. People don't want to keep those types of assets in space in low sec.

The decreased POS fuel usage is nice but again, is it that big enough of a deal to be a carrot?

The Devs feel yes and pointed out that we might not be the ones stomping but someone might come and stomp us.  This is very, very true. As a small gang group we already deal with the simple fact that no matter how good, prepared, organized  or capable we are, we will be eradicated by a large enough group. Is that what they want? That large group will then come in and plant itself on the resource until the end of eternity.

Is that conflict?

Then later, Druur then told me that they were discussing changing all of Low Sec to Faction Warfare in the FW Round table.  "The players?" I asked. "No the devs."  WTF? I've expected it to happen. It is a hammer fall situation. Eventually, someone is going to look around and decide that all of low sec should be FW and people will say it makes sense and living in low sec will be about dealing with Faction Warfare and the unique non-FW low sec will go away.


I wound up pissed enough that I was cursing up the storm for most of the rest of the evening until I calmed down in the keynote. Low Sec needs attention, I agree. Yet, it does not seem as if Low Sec residents are sought out for these changes. Now that FW has gained popularly it feels like not being in FW is to be a subset of a subset (someone that lives in low sec).

The interesting part is that I made a note about something else said during the Planetary Conquest presentation. Foxfour was explaining that the low sec Dust battles spawn in the systems that have the most plexing happening by members of FW. This made me wonder what was going to cause fights outside of PC in MH. It made me worry that FW might be slated to come out way. I hate being the harbinger of doom or making random, wild guesses out of my ass. Yet, I was still worried and when Druur mentioned the feeling that 'FW should be Low Sec' I started to get more worried.

I was also, already angry.  When the presentation started they explained that they are not bringing this to null sec because they do not want to break null sec and have null sec angry with them. I am sure that the side effect of, "we will break this in low sec instead because we don't care if they are upset" is not what was intended. It is what I picked up and I got a bit mad.

I know that Low Sec is my little platform over here to the side. Its mocked by null sec, wished to die by high sec, and seen by Wormholes as an exit or something to come poke at the natives in. The CSM 8 elections focused on people with little to no interest in low sec. We are Eve's bastard children but I picked up this dreadful feeling that we were about to be excised completely as the solution to what and who low sec is.

I want dust to succeed. I want CCP to succeed. I am just starting to wonder if in that path of success the individuality of non-FW low sec is going to be one of the sacrifices they will be making. Its hard to say 'look at me' when you are such a small, unimportant number to a business that does have to look at its numbers. If non-fw focused low sec pilots vanished what blip would we make on the radar?

I hate to ask that question. I want to stand up and announce that we are the most important thing eve. Yet, I have to be a bit rational. The impressions are creeping in from all sides and as much as I may scream and kick at them, I'm one small, unknown voice screaming to protect a niche. How viable, at the end of the day, will that really be?

Comments

  1. I legitimately believe they are setting up low-sec to be a very hunter vs. prey scenario, and that we will be the hunters.
    Everything I'm reading from Fanfest so far sounds like it will incentivize coming to low-sec for the chance of ISK and risking being preyed on by more experienced pirate hunters.
    But I'm an optimistic kind of guy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Altaen: Because they've been so successful at that in the past, right?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm getting the same feeling with the Tags4Sec plan to turn low sec belts into places people fight over rats that drop tags. Mining? What's that?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also fear that Low-sec is to become FW-sec. Perhaps we are just a dying breed and EVE no longer needs/wants the kind of gameplay we enjoy. I wonder if this is how arrows felt when they invented gunpowder.... #doomandgloom

    ReplyDelete
  5. My mistake, I wasn't clear enough: It was a player who asked to extend FW to larger (if not all) areas of lo-sec - the devs did not like the idea, because they want to see a variety of activities taking place in losec, even if they don't know yet what all those activities could be. The devs brought up 'Planetary Conquest' as one example of such an alternative activity.

    Sorry for the false alarm.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for your thoughts on this. I am trying to get more information on planetary conquest and its effects.

    From your last reply I take that planetary conquest is not to be extended to FW low-sec?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Foxfour has a post up on the Dust forums that explains why they picked Molden Heath. Like so much of the Dust rollout they are starting in one contained place before they decide to expand further into the game.

      My first fear was that low sec would all become faction warfare. Dusts reverse travel into FW low sec for planatary conquest is unknown. I believe the presentations are available to watch for finer detail.

      Delete
    2. Thank you for pointing me to that post. Really interesting, as I was making up my mind which region could be next to receive the planetary conquest feature... will safe me a lot of disappointment later on :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …