Skip to main content

CSM: On Voting and Decisions


To my surprise, I've been asked a few times about my opinions on the various CSM candidates and who I am voting for. Most of the questions have come from other low sec residents. Many are not enthralled with the CSM. The negativity about the entire process is almost startling. With no clear low sec candidate  people don't know who to vote for. Many don't want to vote. I don't blame them.

Yet, I still hold onto my strands of belief that even if my ideal situation is not realized, I still should put energy into making an effort. At least, later, I can bitch and froth at the mouth without guilt.

My general recommendations from people were to pick people who were at least good communicators. People who would listen when problems were brought to them. It was one of the harder things. Many candidates are quite comfortable in their pocket and that is what they plan to work with. That is not bad but the hard walls of "my platform" are quite steep and slick when it comes to reaching to them as a peon/pubbie/no-body/scrub/select favorite disparaging term here.

Picking people I can live and hopefully work with proved harder than expected. But it broadened my search from, 'low sec'. I washed the bitter taste of disappointment from my mouth and spent some time reading and thinking beyond my own ego and desires. I looked at the sanity of the candidates  the way that they have responded to people, if they have responded to people, and how they respond and communicate with people. I am biased to those that are willing to share information in a textual form.

For those who do not like to read their information, Xander did interviews with almost everyone at Crossing Zebras. He has received (almost) nothing but praise for the efforts and everyone that listens to things says that it is worth listening to if you listen to things.

Chirality put a massive amount of time into a vote program to help people pick candidates who have like minded opinions. It is fast and easy and can help with the elimination process.

There is another program out there called Vote Match that someone has written. Matched with Chairality's program one can at least get two separate sources to see what matches if one is prone to believing in conspiracy in every corner.

The candidates own threads can be found on the forums under Jita Park Speakers.

Once I found it the voting process was a bit of a pain in the ass.  I've been told that its been cleaned up. The most irritating part was the fact that the names scrolled beyond the boxes you had to drag them into. It is a pretty interface but it was not very useful. I'd have been foaming at the mouth on a smaller screen and as it was, I was still irritated.

I'm also disappointed in the lack of noise about this. CCP puts time and money into having Representatives for their game. Why they don't have more front page stuff I don't know. I had to guess where to go vote at. The bulk of the game does not metagame. They don't roam the blogs, the forums, the news sites, even the games own website. People do not know that hours for plex is an option. I still have people ask me what the CSM is because they have never heard of it.

Mostly though, there is a shroud of negativity from people about the process. I try to be positive. However, it will be nice when this 'election' season is over. I do not find politics amusing and as I have watched the CSM elections unfold it is just an in game version of the normal political behaviors that always seem to crop up with elections. I cannot say that it has been a pleasant addition to my normal Eve reading. It has diverted my attention back to some of my neglected back reading and writing. Perhaps there is unexpected good in my frustration.

Results are due at Fanfest. I'm not going to make guesses as to who wins and where they rank or anything else. I have no guesses and no ideas. I just hope that whoever is elected will remember that the game is composed of everyone else and not just them and their platform and people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …