Skip to main content

Skill Changes Incoming

Just some random thoughts on todays Dev Blog by CCP Ytterbium. The skill changes are out and explained in depth in a dev blog.  Changes will be in the spring expansin.  There is still enough time to start training.
I find them very interesting for two reasons:
#1 – It will be easier for people to get into ships.
The reduced cst of training. 
Along with CCP's entire ‘making things make more sense’  these changes are a lure for new players.  New players will be able to get into the hulls they want to get into in hours instead of days sometimes and days instead of weeks in a few others.  People will be able to gorge themselves upon T1 hulls.
#2 – There will be a lot of poorly skilled ships flying around.
People are lazy.  People want things now.  CCP has just handed people a jar of cookies with no milk.  They will consume the cookies and realize, after their mouths are coated in chocolate and they can barely swallow that they have nothing to wash it down with.  (I don’t like milk myself, but lots of people seem to.)
The accessibility, to me, appears to be a beautiful trap.  People are already lured into shiny and large hulls due to their accessibility.  Now, we will see week old battleships puttering around with small guns.  I also suspect, fewer T2s unless something interesting happens during their balancing to increase their appeal.  Right now, when looking at a T1 logistic ship vs a T2 logistic ship many people are not going to take that time to train into logistics V without the mandate of a fleet doctrine.
I foresee a lot of poorly, poorly skilled ships flying around in the future.  When T2 guns are in one hand and a new shiny hull are in the other many people will chase down that hull.  Or so, I think.  It will be interesting.  I also suspect new players, presented with all of this stuff NOW will wind up scattering their skill points even further and sooner.
Capitals
The spaceship skills to get into capitals are much decreased.  However, the prerequs have been changed to keep the training time the same.  The nice part about this is that instead of spending 40 some days training battleship V that time can be used to train Jump Drive Operation 5 which is already a mandatory skill for a carrier pilot so that they can train Jump Drive Calibration.  JDC is the skill that expands your jump capable distance.  Training it to 4 is a bare minimum for any jump capable ship. 
Tech 2s
The changes are putting skill training into skills needed to fly the actual ship.  Before, as with capitals, a large amount of time was burnt training skills for spaceship hulls.  Then almost the same amount of time was needed to train the various skills to use the ship itself.  The training time is reduced but made more sensible at the same time.  Instead of looking at the ship and then the modules the ships prerequisite skills will place the pilot into the area of accessibility for the modules.
This is nice but to take advantage of the changes it may make sense to plug in several skill books before the changes if they can be plugged in now but are not.  Things like command ships will require a different set of training skills in the future to reach the point that the skillbook can be injected.  That was what it took me a moment to read and understand.  If you have a skill that will change its prerequeists you will still be able to use that skill in the future.  They will not, however, be giving us the prerequists if we don't already have them.  The only skills we are gaining are the Racial Destroyer and Racial Cruiser ones.
Until the hauler changes come through Iteron V’s will become super popular as the new loot piñata.  17 days for an Orca is kind of ‘wow’ but again they will fall under my ‘not training as well as they should’ prediction.  Once these changes come through Sugar will be training to fly an Orca.  Grand Theft Orca is one of my dream situations and I need to be prepared for it.

Comments

  1. Thanks for the DevBlog link, just read through it.

    The other side of the "new players, faster" coin is also "specialized alt, faster." I don't know much of anything about the capital ship world, but it sounds like making a carrier alt from scratch just got faster. Hmm.. does that mean it is possible for NullSec stalwarts to make a Titan alt faster whose sole job will be to run jump bridges (and not hit the wrong button)?

    I wonder if anyone is going to complain that CPP violated the "if you can fly it today" rule by saying that their Navy Issue Battleship now takes Racial Battleship II and they only have Racial Battleship I. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. The other issue with your "cookies and no milk" scenario is that those venturing into low/null, or even staying in pre-:TotallySafe:-hisec are going to end up shedding some particularly acidic tears when they buy a brand-new Navy Domi or Navy Raven and get it popped easily by a small gate camp, or even find themselves soloed by a well-skilled cruiser or faction frig pilot who ninjas some loot from their mission, or has a war on their corp.
    I forsee an exponential increase of tears from this, and not of the good sort (though I'm not particularly fond of tears of any sort).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the changes to orca/carrier. Can't fly either of them yet but when these changes hit I'll probably be able to inject the skill right away.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th