Skip to main content

Naughty Social Words


I was poking at a conversation just to and I said something a bit naughty.

The conversation was about running level four missions.  Now, I know I should never join in a mission conversation.  Well, almost never. I really have nothing valuable to say about them because I'm pretty clueless about running missions in any type of productive manner.  However, I don't let that stop me.  I'm a confident and bold woman willing to throw down in chat!

Not really.  However, sometimes I feel mischievous and like to say naughty, naughty things.  While discussing the absolute need for T2 drones to run level 4 missions due to their value at killing frigate sized NPCs and freeing the battleship I said, "Fly something else besides battleships?"

"They are fastest and most powerful at the missions," I was told.
"Fleets?" :D

I had to drop in the possibility of doing something so dark, and sinful that it might ostracize someone from their community and have them kicked from their corps and perhaps banned from the game.  I had to suggest that they fleet up to do a mission instead of attempting to shoehorn themselves into a one size fits all package.

I was told "No" for several reasons.
1.     Battleships are easy for new players to get into.  They don't require a bunch of skills to get into and use.
2.     Loss of many ships in PvP and desire to acquire as much income as possible, personally to replace this.
3.     Being a team of one is enough.
I think the biggest blow to group play that Eve has is the fact that the reward for fleet operations is split.  Yet, I think that not splitting it and each member getting an equal and complete share would also be bad because it would encourage group farming and blitzing of missions.  No easy answer there.  It is frustrating that people can work to the point of soloing the content and rendering corporation to be the subpar choice for the situation.

With later, higher content corporation becomes mandatory and the rewards are a lot better to compensate.  Still, each time I watch another new player work around Dagan in the Sister's of Eve epic arc and it always takes a moment for someone to suggest that they ask for help.  "Really?" is the clueless response.  "Yup."  There are people that hang around and just help new players with that particular mission.

I do love new players.  Vov commented on it as I was babbling inanely to him about something a new player had said.  I had to agree.  I adore true new players.  They are my favorite flavor.  Not that I don't love my salty, bitter vets too.  

But new players are something that I enjoy.  I like rookie chat.  I like it a lot and gave spent a lot of time in there answering questions and helping people to get their feet under them when they first start.  If I get tired of it I take a break. Normally it is more along the lines of my attention being diverted to other things at the time rather than me getting tired of answering the same question over and over.

And although I will blow a newbie up in a moment I really enjoy them and want them to stay in the game and become a part of what makes Eve great and enjoy being here/there (not sure which one to use tbh).  Because so much fun is in the social stuff and I am learning as I play other games that the social interaction isn't an automatic consideration of new players, ways to help them acquire the knowledge of the importance of fleets in Eve sooner than they do would be a good thing and go further towards retention.

Comments

  1. This particular problem (and it is a fundamental Eve PVE problem) results from the fact that Eve copies the PVE framework of MMOs that offer character advancement in XP for beating PVE content, while completely dispensing with XP.

    In games with XP-for-monsters, it is quite feasible to increase the reward for group play directly, because XP cannot be transferred -- tune up the exact reduction for XP sharing and you're golden. In Eve, the major rewards for beating NPCs are bounty ISK and loot, both transferable resources, which means that increasing them for group play makes group play an unwanted faucet, and not increasing them for group play makes group PVE suboptimal. Only greatly reducing the number of individual enemies and forcing players to band in fleets to even take them makes it work, like in incursions and wormholes.

    I'm afraid there's no easy solution to this one without redoing all the PVE content eventually. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was always playing games together with my girlfriend. I lured her to EVE, she minds her skill queue but she barely does anything. At the beginning we tried to play together but quickly realized that we are better off playing separately. So despite perfect communication, same level of XP, we couldn't play together because EVE PvE is so unrewarding to group.

    I'd have a solution though: put active tank on the rats. Not unbreakable of course but significant. Let's say the mission is designed for 100 DPS destroyers and the rats have 2000 HP passive tank, so you kill one in 20 seconds. Replace this with 1000 HP passive and 50HPS active. Alone, with 100DPS the rat still takes 20 seconds (your effective DPS is 50 as you damage 100, the rat reps 50). If a group of two arrives, their effective DPS is 150 (100+100-50) so they kill that rat 3x faster than alone. The mission still don't force grouping (you can solo it) but encourages grouping.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So... you've just doubled the difference in isk/hour between a geared veteran doing that mission (who will probably optimise to volley the rat, and negate the active tank completely), and the newbie (who will face the full hp as intended). On top of the factor 2-3 DPS difference that was already present.

      Delete
    2. I don't know how long it is since you last ran a mission Gevlon, but many mission rats already do have active tanks.

      Just as an example I picked the first rat listed for my current mission (Gistatis Primus), and according to Chruker's NPC ship database (http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/npc_ships.php) it has an active shield tank with a 60% chance to regen 150hp every 5 seconds.

      Delete
  3. I've run into a different aspect of this problem. New players hear too many stories that they assume strangers wanting to fleet up are running some sort of scam.

    I've had other players tell me that if we fleet up I'll be allowed to shoot them. *sigh*

    ReplyDelete
  4. I to try to help noobs when and where ever i find them, and I also think they should change missions to be a less lone wolf ocupation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio