Skip to main content

Assessing Exploration

With the incoming ship changes in Retribution and coming up in Retribution 1.2 new skills have been added and will be added.  There will also be other skills that will make the entry into some ships simpler   However, the skills that are added are support and secondary skills that will increase the length of time for a newer player to fly a ship very well.

I had to take a two month break from turning my scout into a perfect scanner for the battlecruiser skill changes.  She is also a combat pilot (technically) and it would have been silly for me to skip out on that part of the change.  However, as I get back onto track to finish topping everything off to fives across the board I notice that becoming a maximized explorer takes some time.  And while a new player may not have to have fives across the board I wondered if the bar of entry might be a bit higher than it needs to be. 

There is already a precedent for these things.  Barges have become easier to access across the board.  Skills are being lowered from V to IV in other places.  There are still advantages to having a skill maxed out.  I am not even thinking of decreasing skill lengths. Yet, I do not think that does not mean adjustments may not be something that should be looked at outside of the basics 'spaceship' accessibility tree.

One of the five parts of the tutorial mission is the exploration missions string.  These missions introduce players to what the various exploration sites are named and 'look' like.  The player retrieves a certificate using a site appropriate module.  The hardest part of these missions is learning how to use the probes.

Exploration probes function on a three dimensional max.  3D is hard to explain in 2D.  There are not exploration videos that can also be watched but, sadly the missions string remains one of the most frustrating  unrewarding and unfriendly of the groups.  However, some are lured in by the possibilities and still wish to explore.

Recently, frigates were buffed and exploration frigates were brought up to a similar strength as Covert Operations (T2) frigates.  For high security space, where the sites are easier to find this eased some of the first barrier someone had.  A ship to scan with.  A ship with bonuses to scan.

To use the Magnate as an example it has a 7.5% bonus to its probes scan strength   This improves the ability of the probes to find and narrow down the site.  It also has a 5% bonus to the codebreaker, analyzer and salvager cycle timers.  This speeds everything up and speed is ISK in this game.

Comparing it to its T2 brother the Anathema one must remember that the Anathema is a Covert Ops frigate. It can fit a Covert Ops cloak which allows a ship to warp when cloaked.  The Anathema also has other bonuses but the exploration related ones are a 10% increase in the scan strength of probes.  It has a 10% reduction to survey probe flight time as well.  Useful enough but one of those, "Okay. Sure. Does anyone one use this?" type of skills on a ship.  

The Anathema does not have the 5% bonus to the codebreaker, analyzer and salvager cycle timers.  However, when one is using such a ship there would be a assumed suggestion that other relevant skills had been trained up to the point that the 5% bonus was no longer of interest as well as the other abilities of the ship overcoming them.

A T1 frigate may use two gravity capacitor upgrades.  This rig increases the scan strength of a ship by 10% each time.  This means that for high security space a T2 frigate is not an absolute must for scanning strength which is good.  It is good because ISK is a major barrier of entry.

I noticed that T1 probe launchers do not have any scanning bonuses to them.  T2 probe launchers have a bonus of 5%.  Faction launchers have a bonus of 10%.  T2 launchers take two weeks to train into.  Faction launchers take the same time as T1 launchers but easily cost 50 million ISK.  Should T1 launchers get a bonus?  Or should the ability to fit a 3rd gravity capacitor upgrade rig onto a T1 ship compensate for the 10% given by a faction launcher for a new player?

If one is going to go out and explore, starting in high security space and doing Ladar, Radar, Magnetometric and Combat sites they need to have the ability to use:
  • Codebreaker
  • Analyzer
  • Salvager
  • Probe Launcher
  • Probes
They will need to know Astrometics, Hacking, Salvaging, and Archaeology.  Each comes with a full set of prerequisite skills that will take a few hours to a day or two to learn.  Technically, with Astrometics along the new player is good to go.  However, that is like saying have at it with gunnery 1 and frigate 1.  Mission and be successful.  No.  They are advised to learn their support skills and this holds true for exploration. Then there are the support skills:
  • Astrometrics is a basic skill supported by:
  • Astrometric Acquisition : Skill at the advanced operation of long range scanners. 10% reduction in scan probe scan time per level.
  • Astrometric Pinpointing : Greater accuracy in hunting down targets found through scanning. Reduces maximum scan deviation by 10% per level.
  • AstrometricRangefinding : Skill for the advanced operation of long range scanners. 10% increase to scan probe strength per level.
  • Astronautics Rigging : 10% reduction in Astronautics Rig drawbacks per level. (also allows one to install grav rigs)
This is one of those points where skill points vs career come into play.  They are going to need some basic combat abilities as well as these specific modules. The skill spread for the items is also a bit broad.  Salvager's are one of the items that a player should be able to use immediately, if poorly.  Yet, its requirements cause the game to give the player a civilian salvager to not break up the timing it will take to use the regular salvager item.  Similarly, the codebreakers and analyzers are also scattered about in their basic requirements  yet each of these items is very important to the minimum needs of a new explorer.

And then there is the fact that exploration leans so heavily towards T3(Tech 3) or Strategic Cruisers because people wind up wanting is all of these on one ship.  Now, because each site has its own needs spare modules can be switched out without much effort.  A Radar site will only user a codebreaker and the hacking skill.  The Analyzer is not needed for this site.  The salvager is optional if the explorer wishes to salvage any wrecks that they may make.  The site may or may not have NPCs that guard the containers or spawn when the containers are interacted with.  

A Magnetometric site is going to potentially need a salvager and an analyzer  I often get sites that need either or item for the cans. I thought that the little pop up would be a fair warning but sometimes I need both.  Again, NPCs may be in the site and they may spawn upon can interaction.

Switching out fittings, not having a one size fits all ship option in the first week: That's Eve. I'm okay with these things.  A stream lining of the skills needed to access the equipment might not be a bad idea.  Exploration is a career on its own but it is not stand alone.  Combat skills, ship skills, and tanking skills are still completely relevant to someone entering an exploration career.

Then there are Ladar and Gravimetric sites.  These sites are both filled with harvestable materials.  Outside of high sec, Ladar sites may resolve into either a gas nebula or a combat site with booster materials.  Belt rats also spawn in both Gravimetric sites so normal mining precautions against such things are advised.  Some explorers find Gravimetric sites and attempt to sell them to miners.  If they will buy them, I don't know.  It is done at times and an idea.

I'd not seek to change the sites only smooth the accessibility for the newer player into the career.  It is highly competitive, and sadly filled with experienced people in complex, well skilled ships (let's say Tengu cuz that's what I mean) clearing the sites out in seconds.  I like the competitive aspect of it but because it is so competitive I wonder, should it be easier for new players to step into the competition.

Exploration is a very rewarding career. If it was not aimed at new players I'd probably not have sat here and looked over all the bits and pieces and wondered.  However, it is one of the five major tutorial strings.  I've held many a hand and walked them through those missions and listened to them spew hatred for it.  I was one that was so frustrated by them that I didn't start exploring for a long time afterwards.  I guess some would say good, less competition.  That's not my thing.  Maybe more new explorers cleaning out the shiny bits of high sec would push some of those systematic Tengu site clearers out and into more lucrative space.  (Not that I think that would ever happen because risk aversion).

Comments

  1. Hi Sugar, just a quick correction for your post.

    Tech I frigs can only use 2 Gravity capacitor rigs as well as covops due to calibration issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Corrected. Maybe they should be able to use three then.

      Delete
  2. Probe flight time is actively useful for punting (probing down an enemy ship in a single pass, and wing-warping allies on top of them before they notice the probes and GTFO.)

    And the revised t1 scanning frigates all have at least 3 small drones, which is enough combat potential to solo any hisec radar/grav/mag site. Hisec exploration is more accessible than ever.

    Frankly, I found Astrometric Pinpointing a much bigger help than scanning %ages for resolving 'easy' sites faster. The serious percentages are for the harder W-space scans, and for PvP probing against people rocking ECCM.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One other thing a new player can do who really wants to get involved in exploration is get Sisters of Eve faction gear to get the really good gear. CCP was even nice enough to put in level 3 and level 4 high-sec distribution missions so a player wouldn't get frustrated doing combat missions. I know it is a long grind to get the loyalty points but a new player can do it with almost no combat skills.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …