Skip to main content

Negative Side Effects: The Removal of Static 1/10 and 2/10 Complexs

The Retribution patch notes are out. There are a lot of changes. A lot of changes. Reading through this document took more than one run. It was easy to miss things or to get so caught up in one point that you missed another.

Hence, this little gem, which had not been hinted at anywhere else over the last several weeks and months came to light.
World Shaping
1/10 and 2/10 static DED complexes have been moved to the exploration system
This is a very, very bad thing for Low Security Space. I will take a moment to explain why. DED complexes currently come in two forms. The first is a scanable site. These are highly prized by those engaging in exploration. The other is a series of static sites scattered all over the game. These static sites can be found by a beacon in the overview. The beacon is always there. When the beacon is selected you can warp to the beacon. It lands the player on a warp gate which is the entrance to the complex. DED complexes have ship restrictions.

1/10 an 2/10 complexes are restricted to frigates and destroyers. They are meant to be small ship and more entry level content. The rewards are small. A good day may net a module that costs 20 million ISK. The complex respawns 20-30 minutes after they have been completed. In high security space these complexes are prone to being camped and cleaned out by more experienced players. That is the nature of Eve with any static resource. I believe that the original introduction of these complexes was to help alert newer players to exploration and DED complexes in general.

With Retribution it has been decided to place these complexes back into the exploration system where they will only be able to be found by someone using scanning probes. This makes complete sense until someone from low security space stands up and goes,

"Hey! What about us?!" What about us? Why would the residents of Low Security Space become upset enough to write a thread on the forums petitioning CCP to leave a PvE option in the area? It is because, like every other group in Eve we use our environment to further our game. I've said again and again that the residents in low security space are there because they want to be there. They also accept the rules and restrictions of low sec.

This means, for most of us, that frigates are not something that we fly a lot. But frigate fighting flourishes in some areas and this is why. Static 1/10 and 2/10 complexes. These sites are a focus to low sec small ship PvP. Lets pull up Heild's ship kill statics. Heild has a 2/10 static complex in it and is the home of the Black Rebel Rifter Club. A low sec PvP corp that focuses on frigate fighting.
This corporation has build up an entire culture around its static 2/10 complex. They are well known to honor 1v1 fights and to fight predominantly in frigates. The complex itself is a place to go without gateguns or station guns to pop the small ships. The other thing about the complex is that when a ship warps to the beacon they are pulled to zero.

For those that do not understand it means that every ship will land at the same spot when they enter. It stops people from dropping in sniping ships to do nothing but feed off of frigate kills. If such a ship were to land the residents will reship into something appropriate and dispose of the idiot. Frigate fighting may involve brawling but it is a decision making process. In a frigate you do not sit at zero and wait for someone to land on you. You create some distance and then when the fight lands a decision making process starts. Landing at zero does not create a disadvantage that a waiting frigate is going to take but instead gives both sides a chance to make a decision.

 What about large ships? Systems with static complexes are populated. If a large ship decides to go and try to pop a small ship they will quickly find themselves over run and explode in the death of a thousand cuts. Also, the frigate itself will be able to simply leave the situation before the larger ship can orient itself. But the people going to the site are going to the site for the PvP most of the time.

People do run the site for ISK but the ISK in a static complex is nothing that is amazing. Unlike the ones in high security space, the ones in low security space are not permanently camped by high end ships. Because, the high end ships would become prey to the local residents. They are more interested in the PvP then the PvE. This discourages camping and the complex is run occasionally through the day. Other groups in the area also use this. W

hile not all PvP corporations may focus on frigates individual players have different tastes. A static site like this pulls in a steady draw of locals looking to down ship into something fast and fun. Also, it is a prime place of education for new members. Fitting our newest players into T1 fit T1 frigates and sending them off to fight in Heild at a 2/10 complex is a thing.

Several of my earliest battles my boys down shipped into frigates and took me there to learn basics in a spot where I would not be instantly destroyed by the other fleet or gate/station guns. This is very much a simple change that will deeply affect the residents of low security space.

I believe that CCP changed it without realizing that it would cause Low Sec reaction because no one really knew what we were using the locations for. Now we have to tell them. We have to try to make it clear that PvP is a thing here. We have created with the tools that we have been given.

What we have created are arenas of free formed frigate focused fighting in environments inhabited by people that support and encourage this activity in the space. The residents of low sec are a small group. A small group of fiercely independent individuals who chose life in that space because they don't want null sec and they don't want high sec.  Low Sec is about small groups and independence and that is what thrives down there.

 However, the side effect is that we often do not lift our voices loud enough to be heard. I was reading yet another debate about low sec on the Eve Online Forums. To often the people making the idea selections and critiquing the area were not people that lived in the area. More members of high security space and null security space speak up about what they would like low security space to be then the people that live in low security space.

There is not enough voice from the members of low security space itself. It is not that we do not have a voice. Oh my, do we ever. We just need to focus it a bit better. Faction Warfare is its own group and has its own Representative and developer interest. Low Sec is not only faction warfare and it should not be interpreted through faction warfare's views and wishes. Just as with the suggested gategun changes we, as the people who actually live under and are affected by these changes have to stand up and speak. It is a fallacy to believe that we are not as much a community as any other group in the game. I can only hope that we will be heard.

 Miura Bull also has words at his blog Brutor Bullfighter

 As does Kane Rizzel at A Pirates's Prespective


  1. Good post. It's a strange decision, and likely one that was taken with little or no research.

    1. Aye. Like many things the focus is so strongly on what High Sec players do to 'farm' their environment that other uses are over looked and left unseen.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.

I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …