Skip to main content

The Scent of ISK

Sometimes when a fleet is formed the scent of burned ISK is strong in the air. In Eve ISK makes the universe spin. Rich or poor to continue in the game most (not all) need a steady supply of ISK. How much ISK one needs is dependent on the tasks and goals that the individual has. But avoiding the need for ISK is nearly impossible. Even if a personal need does not exist due to supplementation from another direction ISK is still important.

If someone wishes to roam Eve and explore the galaxy to see what is there they have almost no need of ISK. Maybe some skill books and a clone upgrade now and then while roaming about in a rookie ship.

There was a roam planned. The boys were asked to bring dictors to the battlefield. They complied and began to ship into it. This was when I started getting together some interceptors. Tackle is always useful and a good fallback role. I was already in Rens at the time. We do not fly dictors as a daily ship so people needed various specialized bits and pieces to fill their fits.

Everyone spent ISK. I purchased and fit an interceptor. The boys needed a few more dictors. The bubble generators were grabbed (aka interdiction spheres). Plus, a normal T2 fit costs a little bit of change. Add in ammunition and rigs and it’s easy to spend 200-300 ISK for a fleet where we expected to die.

It was not a fail fleet. It was the side effect of what the roles we would fill would mean. The ships were not sturdy and no one wants bubblers and interceptors around. The ships would be destroyed and the ISK would be spent for a moment of battle.

This is a difference in the games played. It almost goes against the grain. The careful planning, the careful fitting of the ships, the proper allocation of skills and resources all to enter a situation where personal loss has a high outcome.

PvP is expensive because loss is a thing. Its an assume thing. When I missioned I knew that I might lose a ship but I doubt few enter a mission knowing that they are going to go down and burn and that is their place in the fleet. That in their ships destruction is one of the keys to the fleets hopeful success. That is not how most game play works. The goal of winning tends to bring along its friend the assumption of not losing anything.

It is a hurdle that some may need to jump over. Success and failure are measured by goals. The goals may be personal or they may be group goals. It is not a black and white win or lose situation. Without the automatic respawn of possessions when a player character dies the loss is more then a simple static equation. As much energy was put into the ships lost as much as they are put into the ships that won.

It is amusing that finical responsibility is such a thing on Eve. ISK can make or break the game. Not just because of access to new and shiny things but because of access to the tools needed to go forth and do what needs to be done. An empty wallet can push someone back further then an exploded ship can. The "don't fly what you can't afford to lose" mantra is a Rule of Eve. Yet, it can be tempered down with, "Have some type of sensible backup plan." You may not be able to fully faction fit another Machariel but it would be good for a fall back ship to be fit and docked in a hanger somewhere to help with recovery.

It is a constant cycle of funding ones habits. It is where many become frustrated. The gain and loss cycle. In many games once you reach a certain point you start to have more currency then you need. Some may have that in Eve but not most and not by far.

The cost of PvP is perhaps the biggest entry barrier. A group can hold someone's hand, teach them things and walk them through the processes. I guess one could shower one with ISK as well but at a certain point self sufficiency has to kick in. Value is assigned. The loss and gain cycle is entered. But instead of rejecting it the cycle needs to be embraced. It is not so much that I support the grind or a grind but that I say that it gives value to the loss. That is why it is so frustrating.

But, it is also why it is so rewarding.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …