Skip to main content

Bandits and the Blockade Runner

There is some questions about high sec ganking with the new Crime Watch changes that will be coming through. When Crime Watch 2.0 hits it will cause loot thieves to gain an aggression flag that makes them pewpewsble to everyone in the system. This has worried some because their loot scoopers are now in danger. It will not be 'the end to high sec ganking' as some have ranted and raved about. But there will be change.

My first reaction is "And?" Loot scoopers are part of the gank team. There is a lot of comfort in high security space about being able to do things with few to no repercussions. Crimewatch 2.0 opens up those possibilities of being punished for an action. Yet, I don't think it will cause leagues of PvP averse people to descend like a pack of blood maddened piranha at every gank.

It does mean that more time and attention will have to be paid. A moment when the system is clear of combat ships may mean that some kills escape. There is more risk on the side of the gankers team but that is not a bad thing. It may not be a wanted thing but it is not a bad one. Loot piniata's will still roll from station to trade hub full to the gills with goodies.

The blockade runner would shine as a loot scooper in high security space. With warp core stabilizers along with its natural resistances and the damage that it can soak up a properly fit blockade runner has a solid chance of making it back out of a gank's aftermath with the loot.

But what of the freighter containers? They are to large to scoop into a blockade runner.

That means that the ganker will have to chose to avoid this ship or place more risk on the field for the loot. A gank would have to increase in value to make risking the gankers freighter worth it. It is not an unfair trade off. The risk and reward formula does not travel in only one direction.

Or the ganker can chose to not risk a 1.5-2 billion isk freighter on the field. Then freighters could load up freighter containers to make them a less appealing target. This, to me, is a very good thing. It would be a better possible future then one where freighters received a massive buff to their natural defenses.

Freighters are the only ships that carry these giant containers. T1 haulers and Orca still flow through the ship lanes fat and ripe for the plucking. An Orca may take a larger fleet to attack if it is tanked.

If.

Such a small word but one of great resonance and power in Eve.


If they fit tank.
If they have over X amount of isk.
If they have an escort.
If they are auto piloting.
If... if... if..

Comments

  1. Instead of a blockade runner, I'm wondering about a shield tanking deep-space transport like a Mastodon. It has a greater cargo capacity and built-in warp core stabilizers. Throw on an ASB or maybe even two and have a fleet booster in a command ship and I'd think you'd have a great chance of getting away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Again, something I agree with. If they want to loot that freighter wreck they going to risk there own one. Sounds interesting. But with a good support and some safe spots in system it shouldn't be much of a problem to scoop those containers.

    Click the warp to safe spot button with your freighter.
    Target your freighter with your webbing alt.
    Wait till 1/3 of speed on the freighter than hit loot all.
    Web the Freighter with 2 or 3 webs and he is gone.

    Of cause your webbing alt doesn't get flaged because he tries to tackle a known suspect right? You just need to make sure there is no one waiting with a scram.

    To the transport-ships, I think many refer to them as blockade runners in general but the general term is transport ships.
    Blockade runners = cloakies, (Viator, Crane, Prowler, Prorator)
    Deep-Space transports = heavy tanked (Occator, Bustard, Mastodon, Impel)

    All are fine ships and the tank you can put on these DSTs is just fantastic. Once the container changes are out and they are packed smaller than unpacked they might get used more often.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.


I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …