Skip to main content

Pondering the Path of Training

Ender: It's not just the guns changing the math. It's the skills you need for the guns that changes the math
Ender dropped this nugget of bitter wisdom into the discussion in corp chat last night about skill plans, training a character with well rounded core skills vs training for a ship or fit. I’m very attached to it and will hold onto it forever.

While Eve has many paths most traveled they have few paths that must be traveled. Individuality and personal choice are the name of the game. But, just because a player can go careening down whatever path amuses them does not mean that every choice is a sensible one.

Over the last few days, I have been discussing character progress paths with a few corpmates. I was taught, and I subsequently teach learning a character’s core skills first. While Eve has many skills that do many things there are some skills that effect every ship that you fly every time you fly it. These are core skills and except for the handful of people that will never undock, something I’d call mandatory.

---Shield Management
---Shield Operations
---Energy Management
---Hull Upgrades
---Evasive Maneuvering
Spaceship Command

These are all skills that I was told to get to rank V and that I urge others to do the same. They affect everything you fly, improving your fitting abilities, capacitor volume, hull/armor/shield amounts, agility, and general flying speed. That 5% is what saves you in some battles.

The hardest part about the core skills is deciding when do you learn them? When Diz put together my skill plan he gave me a very long list of things to learn and told me to learn them in whatever order I wanted to learn them. Most of these skills were core skills, support skills and secondary skills. The end goal of most was to rank V although a few stopped at IV. I can promise that nothing stopped at I OR II OR III. Some of them took more than a little bit of time to learn. However, with the support of my corporation behind me I embarked on the task to learn all of these things. It took me months. I can say that learning them was one of the best decisions I made and the grueling wait to learn ’cool’ things was worth it.

Now, I can learn cool things and when I learn them I am inhibited by my own limitations not my characters. I never thought that I would be in the position where I could do things better than others. Yet, as I attempt to explain this philosophy to my new corporation mates, I find them staring at me in the same way I stared at my corpmates all those months ago. I need to encourage them to patience and waiting through the training before they dive into ships that help compensate for their lack of skills.

Compensation does not sound bad. Denying oneself cool things seems silly in a game. My automatic response is suck it up. However, snappy come backs do not win people's hearts or change their minds. Instead, as I attempted give reason to waiting or 'denying' one's self, Ender popped in with his crusty bit of bitter wisdom.

The difference between T1 and T2 guns on paper is very small. The difference between T1 guns and T2 guns in skill is very large. It is not that the inert object of a T1 module vs a T2 module is better, it is the fact that to learn that you learned so many other things that all apply to that module. It is a sum of its parts. The many pieces of a while.

Conveying that end goal and asking people to commit to it is harder than I expected. I remember sucking it up and believing in the boys. It worked for me. Along the way, I learned to fly my ships because they were all I had. It was a beneficial side effect. But at the same time I won't and can't order anyone to do what they don't want to do. Only suggest and try to convince to my philosophy. I know not everyone wants to learn everything to V and I am not asking that. However, that is also the point made. I am not asking for everything to be learned to V just the most valuable tools.

Which brings me back to another fashion of character development. Skilling into specific ships and fits.

I have a hard time with this one. On one side I want to say that it is a bad idea. On the other, it is very situational and my personal opinion is tainting the topic. Having discussed and learned more about fleet doctrines I see where there is an advantage depending on situation. It still rubs me the wrong way a bit and it does not remove the importance of core skills, secondary skills, and supports. I also believe that my innate distaste for being ordered makes me buck and reject the system some. But that is why I do the individualist low sec thing. I can't get behind the concept of being in a poorly skilled battleship over a well skilled battle cruiser. I also understand that it is situational and there are places where that is the BEST choice. I just don't like said choice. It is a game of decisions.

Fleet Doctrines work. They work very well. I think I am trying to separate my worry that a player may specialize their character into doctrines to the detriment of other things. But, this is something that will correct with time. My own inexperience in the situation and reaction from pressures others have placed on me are obvious when I step back and look. My own stubbornness is trying to blind me with a muleish resistance.

I also feel that I would have accepted the 'fit to doctrine' aspect when I accepted that I was going to a corporation that had it. If I had a problem with it, I would not have accepted the corporation. Then I ask myself, where is that line of 'corporation rule' vs individual choice? Or, perhaps I should not ask where the line is because a task for the line to be defined. Not that it is my role in the corp but being who I am, I stick my fingers in the pie until they are well and truly burned or stinging from being slapped.

I'll have to revisit this subject, I believe. My thoughts dance around because there are so many variables. I am warring with personal belief vs personal choice. It's a rather dangerous topic. It would seem that I am arguing with myself so that I can hopefully and more skillfully present my argument to others in the future.

Aside: Ever, on a cool day, dip your hands into a pool of sunlight? The tingling waves of heat are blissful across the surface of your skin. Fall is a lovely time of year.


  1. I've had to resort to treating myself to get through gritting my teeth about skilling up to V in certain things. I recognise the value of V in those skills and yet I find it hard to accept 4 to 8 days where it feels as if "nothing" is happening in my character progression. I'm still not finished with any sort of basic plan since I'm split over industry and piloting. A nearly 4 month old (tomorrow) character and I still can't fit and fly a BC as I'd like.

    My solution for coping is to never train two V skills in succession. I try to order the skill plan so that between the silent gaps of skilling you spend a day training up a series of skills from I to III (or IV) that have a more obvious effect than say 2% rate of fire.

    Example - I'm about to spend the entire week skilling Gunnery to V. Before it happens I filled out the skill queue with all I needed to practice on rats with Amarr and Caldari frigates using lasers and missiles. That'll amuse me test flying all week and I won't notice Gunnery crawling to V .


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.

I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …