Skip to main content

A PvP Carrot?

I've spent a lot of the morning working on turning the raw information note from my live blogging at Eve Vegas into more palatable chunks of reading material while waiting for Razor to wake up so we can meet for lunch. I've made it through the first two with four more to go. At the rate of 2-3 hours per post... it will take a bit to crunch through it all.

I've been wondering how the new bounty system will affect low sec PvP. As well as low sec into null sec PvP.

A bounty is a bounty. It is not something that many of us think about. However, if bounties are placed on corporations and alliances and individuals it seems that the action of coming to low sec to fight has just been given a cookie. It has the potential to suddenly be not just about the 'good fight' or just going to 'PvP' but about going to PvP for whatever reasons (good fights, PvP, Revenge) and having the chance to acquire a monetary gain.

Right now, it is wildly accepted that most (not all) of Eve does not make money off of PvP. PvP sinks isk and items. Sometimes someone with a bounty is podded. There is always glee on coms when a pimped blingship has pissed off the loot fairy and all the delicious stuff drops. This ISK is nice but it is not expected.

Bounties being paid out across the entire fleet on particular pilots/corporations/alliances mean that there will be some ISK flowing out of the PvP.

Will this become a carrot to those who already want to engage in some PvP?

I wonder. Right now how much ISK a person places on another person is subjective to them. If someone is killed and they place a 1mil ISk bounty on their killer that is not incentive to hunt that individual down and kill them. The perception of value for a player kill will have to change to make the average 'killer/ganker/pirate/pvpr' worth chasing down.

But on the corporation or alliance level? There have been many hated groups in the game. There are currently hated groups in the game. The bounty system lures a chunk of the unaffiliated population who has no interest in politics but every interest in killing to do the deeds of others. With enough ISK on a corporation or alliance they can suddenly go from fighting a normal large scale war to having to deal with a constant chewing and harassment around their edges. If the bounty system stretches to things like POSs the potential is very creative for those looking to have their cake (of PvP) and eat it too (make some ISK).

It would give validity to anti-pirates. Right now if they fight us it is just to fight. With the bounty system behind them they have more reason to engage. Now they are rewarded for the pirate killing that they are doing.

But I feel that the numbers will be telling. A 50k bounty is not an incentive to hunt a player down, especially a player that resides in low sec or null sec. Perhaps, the mercenaries and anti-pirates can set forth with an education campaign and educate the public on the costs of PvP to help them set a more palatable reward.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th