Skip to main content

Self Destruct Now Generating Kill Mails?!

It seems that self destruct is now giving killmails. Last night, I discussed this with someone and they siad that it was showing up on the test server. I was going to log in and play with it today, but I may have had my question answered for me already.

Now, I was flipping through the super kills at the top of eve-kill.net's site and found this nyx kill where they confirm that he was in structure and self destructed but still generated a killmail.

Word from the comments is that the killmails are malformed and a bit broken but being generated nonetheless.

I personally hail this as a good thing. It will be interesting to find out how this affects the use of capital ships. Without self destruct not creating a killmail a ship is committed or it is not. Is the aversion to public capital ship loss so great that people will stop fielding them? Or will fights improve now that capital ship pilots have no reason to press self destruct and go down when they are still in shields or just touching armor?

Will more people want to field capital ships now? I've heard noise that some alliances demand capital pilots to self destruct and refusing can have you removed from the alliance. How many people would field capitals if they did not have those restrictions attached to them?

How many people mind losing their ships on a personal level?

I know that I am personally terrible about getting off the field unless I am told to. I've fought with self preservation desires more then once in battle because I was not sure if I should stay or get off the field. I'm still often not sure. I don't want to go down if I do not need to go down but I also do not want to bail on my people. Its something that is situation and will take more time and confrontations and later, breakdowns to find the answer to.

I've learned about sacrifice to get other ships off grid. I fly low value ships in the big picture and I am normally one of the lesser skilled pilots on grid. I don't mind throwing myself into those situations but I also don't want to run just because I may go down.

I figure I'll figure it out eventually.

But, Eve is about ship loss. Eve is about many things but it is very much about ship loss. Ships dying moves the entire Eve economy. When people ask for there to be 100% pockets of safety in Eve they ask CCP to break the game. This includes the parts of the game that they like.

Without ship loss there is no need for ships to be built. With ships not built there is no reason to have modules on them. Without either of these things we don't need the materials that go into producing ships. We don't need the ammo to fill the guns and the drones to fill the bays. There would be a dramatic reduction of loss that would ripple across the game like a tsunami and leave a shattered wake in its path.

I'm not even going to think about what it would do to the value of ISK.

Mission runners may explode, but not on the level of wars and combat.

Ships must die for Eve to continue to function. I can only hope that this change will bring forward more ships to transcend into glory. May the map burn.

Comments

  1. Here's an Aeon that self-destructed at 40% armor on friday. Malformed killmail and all. http://irc.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13985906

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Passion is so circular

I should dust the blog and delete the spam to leaks in through googles not so bad filters.

I log in from time to time to check my mail and see some of my friends. But, of lat I've commented on a few things in r/eve and it makes me think. Not of the impassioned things that I once thought about as I played the game but of the passions of the game.

I have the gift of several eve players are parts of my life. And we talk, but rarely about Eve. Most of them have left to some extent or another but the relationship that we gained is still strong. I do not hate Eve but I am still exhausted with Eve, even now when I am so far out. It seems to be CSM summit time and the anger and race that sits atop everything related to the game is still there.

It is interesting in its exhaustive existence. The passion is there and the player reaction continues to go full circle. Some things are still said the same way over, and over, and over again. Is it love? Is it hate? Or is it just stimulation that i…

CSMX - Post #20

Summer is here and CCP is very much out of the office. Sion made a good point in wondering why everyone leaves Iceland when it has its best weather. What it means is that all is mostly quiet on the dev blog front. There are some things happening but the dev blogs and news announcements have not yet happened. The skill points were delivered on Tuesday so yay for unallocated skill points.

Over in CSM chat, there has been a lot of back and forth about sov and measuring the impact and success of things so far. I can say that CCP and the CSM are watching it. The pros and cons are coming in pretty hot and heavy. Some are being looked at now. Some have to see how things are going and if and how the direction needs to be tweaked.

In my corner, I'm starting to gather things together. The summit is in seven or so weeks. In between then and now I need to gather up my question list and write down a few topics of discussion. I'm starting now because I have personal vacation at the end of A…

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways.

So am I.

Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills.

I don't like them.

That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it.

When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said that t…