Skip to main content

A Handful of Darkness to Burn the Universe

Eve is driven by death.

How dramatic that sounds! I was walking throuugh the grocery store and thought about that. Then I purchased some fruit rollups because I'm really five inside. So there I am, picking up my fruit rollups (I went with a mixed flavor pack) and debating Eve Online while buying groceries (there was also a sale on scalops, so wonderful).

Many will say that Eve is driven by conflict. The inferno trailer discusses how progress is defined. Yet, at the end of all of that progress is motivated by death. We are trying to avoid dying or we are trying to make someone else die. And when I say someone else, I am not talking about NPCs. We're attempting to affect other human players and transfer the death to them.

Death is a big word. Let me be clear that I'm talking about video game death here. I've been reading the MMO Melting Pot a little bit. I find the other games interesting and I am happy that others are as obsessed with writing about their game time as I am. However, the darkness that so defines Eve is in evidence in the different view points out there.

In Eve, we die. We struggle not to. Sometimes we give in to the ineveitable. At other times, we use it to forward a goal. But Eve swirls around death (in game that is). Small deaths, big deaths, war deaths, barge deaths they are all the same.

A favorite quote:

"EVE is not designed to look like a cold, dark, unforgiving world. It's designed to BE a cold, dark, unforgiving world". - CCP Wrangler"

In most video games you die (or fall endlessly and it turns black and you respawn) and its terrible for a few seconds then you get over it. In Eve, death takes all of our stuff. Because we are stuff motivated we are death averse but being death averse does not mean that you can avoid death and therefor death and the chances of death motivate everything.

It is how I "Get Eve". I accepted this before I started playing. In fact, that entire single shard everyone kills you thing was exciting. Last night I was discussing how utterly paralyzed in fear my first few trips to Didoxie were as I watched battles rage outside of the station and expected to be killed before I made it in or out of the station. I also had no understanding of game aggression mechanics, but the entire atmosphere of Eve had driven me into that mental state and it was fantastic. Accepting the loss took longer. It still hurts. I struggle against dying but I know it will happen.

This is how I project my understanding of Eve. I was called a CCP Fanboy the other day while arguing with someone. Of course I had a massive snickering fest over that. The argument burned down to:
"CCP should stop goonswarm becuase they are to powerful"
"Its not fair or right for this to happen"
"Its CCP's responsiibility to intervean and stop it"
"Its unfair for one group to be so powerful"
"It's not right for them to cause problems for other people" (I feel bad for Helicity. The poor things efforts in hulkageddo have been overshadowed by the collaboration with goonswarm this year.)

The best line was: "suggesting ccp fix all the problems caused by the goons is like saying the British should convert to the Euro. Probably a good idea, but never gonna happen."

My response was that CCP does not need to 'fix' any of these problems because they are not problems. Eve is not defined by a neat, predetermened path but by what the people do inside of it. Because another group of players has not risen up to destroy any of the current power blocks does not mean that it can not happen or anything stops it from happening. It means that Eve is working as intended.

I'm using quotes today so from an interview in PC Gamer:

Torfi Frans Olafsson, Creative Director: That’s why we have to show this stuff when it happens. Like when Burn Jita happened, when it was blockaded, people are asking if we’re rooting for the bad guy, the people blockading, and we are not. We are respecting the mechanics of the game, and our role as developers is to provide tools, toys, and mechanics, but it’s not our job to write the story. The story is written by the players.

Our story, as players, is written in the destruction that happens around us. As it is so popular to say on the forums, EVE = Everyone Vs Everyone. Even if one keeps their hands out of the actual intimate moment of spaceship destruction, death is still created to fuel Eve.

Without our industrialists we could not make the universe burn. Without the burning of the universe there would be no need for their wares.

Only in Death does Eve Online have life. Only in Eve, what needs to be destroyed is the other players in the game.

No respawns. No retriever for your corpse. No do over. No fade to black. Just a raw, raw universe.



  1. +1. But apparently EVE needs to be "WoW in space" to be "fiscally viable" for CCP so... :-/

  2. 1 - You don't die, you 'just' lose the stuff that is with you at the time, so you actually lose expended game time (which can mean almost nothing to someone who is on an alliance ship replacement program and a lot to a self employed carebear).
    2 - The game is big enough to accomodate a bit more 'WoW'
    3 - The playerbase has already spoken (80% live in HiSec) lots of people are insisting on not listening (presumably however we are all using the same pricing structure for our subscriptions)?

    1. #2: According to #3, the game is already 80% WoW. Yet there's room for "moar WoW"?? How does this work...inquirind minds would LOVE to know.

      #3: Democracy is only as good as the populace practicing it. In the case of Modern Man, well, HL Mencken was right: "Democracy is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses," (see also: Gewns) and "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and need, and deserve to get it, good and hard." Or maybe it was "Democracy is the misguided belief in the collective wisdom of the individual ignorance." (those last 2, see also: Murrica, and EVE players)

  3. CCP Fozie: "One does not simply wakka wakka into Mordor." (thanks for that Sugar)

    1. You are welcome Anonymous. I have no idea why :D


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sugar’s Non-Technical Guide to Making Boosters

Welcome to my non-technical and outdated but probably still useful guide to boosters.  There have been changes to how things are built in Eve. This was the old POS code before the introduction of new structures in 2016.   This is just a walk through on my wobbling path of booster production.  It took me half a dozen different documents to figure out what I needed to do to make these mythical things.  It is what I do.  It may not be perfect but it works.

This is pirate focused industry.
This guide brought to you by Lain asking me to write it after I tried to explain it in chat.

Why make boosters? Because drugs are good.  Really they are performance enhancers and performance enhancers can give someone that extra edge in PvP.  It was also because my boys used them and when they ran low they often ran out, I could be their supplier.  They would no longer hoard their drugs due to the length of time it takes to get fresh product.. The thought of being a drug kingpin was also very appealing. …

Have you done your Eve Vegas Survey?

I did attend Eve Vegas to the shock of many. I'd already paid for it and allotted the time. It seemed that I should go.

I went to the Grand Canyon and Hoover as well. This is not the space to discuss those amazing places or my new Camera.

Eve Vegas was a bit harder for me to go to then I expected. I've detached from Eve for the most part these past months. It is very easy to be angry, frustrated, and bitter about the past that I lived on. The game, its development, and the players move on while I find myself emotionally stuck. That emotional stickiness does not need to be given to everyone else. Part of experiencing it was shielding people from it. But, as I accepted my items and stared down the poor gentleman that tried to put a wristband around my wrist, I realized that I wasn't in as good of a place as I had hoped to be.

That is where the Survey comes in. There are a few things that I could say and did say. A few of the questions made me want to say a bit more.

One was …

Your ideal roadmap

To try to be a bit more interesting then blogging yet another daily list of summit meetings, how about a question?

In the producer session, as we try to figure out how to fix and improve our communication with teams and how we figure out who should be gone to for features and changes, we discussed the road map.

We discussed what 'our' ideal roadmap would be. This breaks down into the individual roadmaps for each member of the CSM. After all, we are individiuals and we have different dreams for Eve. We have different goals and features that we want to move forward or go back to.

How close are we to what CCP is looking at and planning? We discussed their safety mesures to weigh the value of features. What will this feature do for Eve? It is not enough to have an ideal road map of things you want. Those things have to have value and that value needs to be enough to dedicate the time to the feature.

Do you have an ideal roadmap? A path for Eve to head in the next year or two once …