Skip to main content

On: Cloaking really does stop game play?

I love the Eve Online Forums. I love them with a simple, clean amusement that comes from the amount of chuckling I get from them. While they are filled with trolling and terrible ideas, the amount of wit, sarcasm and snappy responses that fill them make up for it.

I came across this gem tonight and was amused by it for much of the evening.

AFK Cloaking is botting.

I've been reading AFK cloaking threads off and on. I realized, as I read this one today, that people really are under siege by this.

I couldn't understand why. There are neutrals in the systems that I go into all of the time. I try to scout myself, avoid gatecamps and watch for combat probes as I do things.

I understand that I may explode/will explode at any time. Its all part of daily life.

I don't live in nullsec. I venture down there sometimes to rat and sometimes to roam. I don't pretend to understand how nullsec works for people, how the large alliances work, and etc.

It just never occurred to me that it would really shut people down.

I've had my days when I fret a bit. There are six stations in my home system and I can't be bothered to check them all to see if a neutral party is docked up on not. Plus, they may undock at any time. So, I go about my day.

It puzzles me that people cannot/do not.

Some comments about lockdown orders when there is an neutral in system. Everyone is to dock/pos up.

Lockdown orders... hmm... why?

The risk is that a ship might be lost. That is a common risk, so why worry about it until the attack happens or the ship is lost? Sure, it could be a cyno and then they hot drop and all that type of thing but that's part of the game as well.

So, it seems it cloaking in a system and causing the residents to slow to a stop is a popular tactic. I thought it was mostly an Intel type of situation. See who comes and goes, what they fly, where they live. Yet it is truly a tactic that can shut down an entire systems operations. It is taking the risk that they are there and able to hurt you and deciding that the possible loss is worth more then the actual lost productivity.

It just would not occur to me to stop everything. Maybe if I had blinged out ships or something. Still, there are reams of people that are being camped into their systems by someone that may or may not be there.

When they know the person is there will will probably be to late to not have an engagement at hand. I think I assumed that anyone living in nullsec expected that type of thing at any moment.

Comments

  1. You don't understand social people. They don't afraid of losing a ship.

    They afraid of "being pwned".
    They afraid of getting on someones killboard as a trophy.
    They afraid of being laughed at, called noobs on local.
    They afraid of their e-peen shrinking.

    You see things as they are: ships are assets. ISK. Can be converted to time spent making ISK. Losing a ship is 2-3 more anomalies for you to replace. You don't hate anomalies anyway.

    They see things as means to gain respect/liking of peers. Every act of their life is scrutinized and double-checked to make sure it doesn't draw disrespect/dislike on them.

    You can't even imagine how miserable they are for thinking that way. A hint: they rather self-destruct a 30B supercap in combat, giving up both the hope that they'll be saved and the chance to kill a dozen subcaps before going down, just to avoid getting to the killboard.

    I don't know why you don't see this, maybe because you are female (this nonsense is called e-PEEN for a reason, it derives from the hierarchy of apes where only the alpha male could mate while female apes all mate) or maybe because you are a natural born a-social. Anyway you have no clue how lucky you are for being you and not one of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel that I may understand social people but I may not understand people whos value is based upon their social status and their social status is based upon points that you have made.

      It is certainly not my game of Eve. I don't particularly enjoy being someone's killboard stat. However, it is part of the day in and day out that I admit, I assumed, everyone took for granted.

      I've debated the topic of mandated self destruct orders as well. They too confuse me. However, I acknowledge that my lack of experience would limit my topic to my own personal muddle of confusion.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio