Skip to main content

A bigger picture and RMT

This is an area of influence map in Eve Online. The big colored blobs are player owned null sec. In the center is empire space, both high and low sec. There are also chunks of NPC owned null sec.

I don't think about null sec much. I don't care for it. I think, conceptually, it is very interesting. However, I am not interested in becoming an empire builder. I enjoy my life as a low sec wolf (cub really). It takes a lot to hold null space. The groups are hundreds to thousands of players who all hold the same goal of keeping their space owned by their alliance. It is truly a massive and interesting thing.

When I started there were two huge alliances on the map that have vanished over the last two months. One of them had a fail cascade due to rot at its center and fingers in RMT. The other had policies that were not flexible enough to keep up with the shifting political tide of null sec. Plus, there is a bunch of ancient (in game old 6+ years stuff) hatred rolling and frothing about.

The RMT group had been accused of it for a long time. Bots are a problem in all MMOs. They sell the 'in game money' on websites for real money. I first encountered this when I played City of Heroes. The channels would be spammed by people giving websites to buy the in game form of currency. It seemed like a stupid idea. It boggled my mind that anyone would pay real money for something they made as part of the game they wanted to play.

I was slowly educated. I learned that the RMT trade was a huge deal. I just ignored it. When I joined Eve, in rookie chat they would spam every few hours or so their website and prices. There was a nice 'report isk seller' button you could select that blocked them and reported them. I used that quite often and didn't think of it much.

On the Eve Online forums there are many, many accusations of RMT in large alliances who own swaths of space where someone can mine or npc bot in almost perfect safety. Of course people then say no but we all know that RMT is happening. Several large alliance heads over the years have fessed up to it to the tuns of hundreds of thousands of USD. They leave the game since they are banned once it happens.

Eve's security team started going after the RMT traders and Bots with a focus that was brilliant to see. When their first wave of bans came around a month ago, one entire alliance in null sec cascaded into nothing. They lost 5,000 members when the RMT and Bots were banned. It was startling to see.

During the same time, another alliance was losing its space. Not for RMT but because of that old, in game hatred mentioned before. A few days ago I watched their entire section of null vanish under other corporations.

Fascinating game mechanics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th