Skip to main content

Sec Status

The weekends roaming dropped my security status down to a -3.47. This was just high enough to allow me into .06 space but that was about it.

'Ratting aka killing NPC Pirates is the bane of a low sec pvper's life. In null you don't take sector hits for PVP. Sector hits define two things. 1: If you can go into High Sec (people say why go but really, its useful). 2: If people get GCC for shooting you. After you hit -5 you are an 'outlaw' and no one takes a sector hit for shooting you. However, logis take a sector hit for repping you.

The gain vs lose is ridiculous and a huge moaning point. High sec people are like 'you deserve it!' but they seem to forget that null does not lead to sec hits so its not keeping anyone out. Plus, the best sector status gain is in null sec. So nullsec, where there is no Concord control and no 'empire' space has the best way to improve sector gain because it has the biggest bounties and biggest sector improvements. I find myself aboard the 'sec gains should be in low sec and not null' bandwagon.

So my sec status looks like this. These are the last 4 of 7 ships taken out over the weekend. There are two hits for each ship. The first for attacking it and the second for destroying it.

Combat - Agression: -0.5217%
Combat - Ship Kill: -2.0875%

Combat - Agression: -0.4950%
Combat - Ship Kill: -1.9807%

Combat - Agression: -0.5108%
Combat - Ship Kill: -2.0439%

Combat - Agression: -0.2635%
Combat - Ship Kill: -1.0540%

These are 4 different battleship rats in different levels of null sec for status gain.

Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain: 0.2200%
Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain: 0.1980%
Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain: 0.2090%
Law Enforcement - Security Status Gain: 0.2090%

The only reason I can kill battleships is because my corpies shoot them down for me and I finish them off. Otherwise each would be a 15 minute battle and a full cargo hold of ammo. I feel like someone is cutting up my dinner so that I can eat it first. I guess if the boys are wolves, I'm a cub and they have to keep me sustained.

Recently, with one of the last patches that came up security status has broken. It used to be that everyone got the status when they were on grid and shooting the same NPC. Now, only the person that deals the final blow gets the status. CCP has confirmed this as broken. When it will be fixed, we don't know.

Some of course say "good!" but really, its a game breaking mechanism. Yes, I know pirates are not universally loved. However, a change like that affects pirates like *me* the most. New players who are taking up a lifestyle that everyone encourages us to take up as early as possible if we are interested.

Now I have to 'rat in all of my free time to keep my status up, not pewpew which is a stupid option for a pirate, or go flashy red.

To be flashy red would cause me to be a primary target every where I went. As a three month old toon I am *so* not ready for that. Some say suck it up and deal with it. The drown you in it advocacy is also there. Yes, I have an alt that can handle my high sec needs. Still, being flashy red is just freaking inconvenient and not where I am ready to be so soon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th

CSMX - Post #20

Summer is here and CCP is very much out of the office. Sion made a good point in wondering why everyone leaves Iceland when it has its best weather. What it means is that all is mostly quiet on the dev blog front. There are some things happening but the dev blogs and news announcements have not yet happened. The skill points were delivered on Tuesday  so yay for unallocated skill points. Over in CSM chat, there has been a lot of back and forth about sov and measuring the impact and success of things so far. I can say that CCP and the CSM are watching it. The pros and cons are coming in pretty hot and heavy. Some are being looked at now. Some have to see how things are going and if and how the direction needs to be tweaked. In my corner, I'm starting to gather things together. The summit is in seven or so weeks. In between then and now I need to gather up my question list and write down a few topics of discussion. I'm starting now because I have personal vacation at the end

CSM9 - Day 140

The week has been the Summer Summit for CSM9. That did not mean that the world stopped for us. Things in Eve moved forward because we have the Oceanas release coming on the 22nd. CCP Fozzie has released a small interceptor tweak . Interdictors are also being retouched for fine detailing. The thread about it is up. This is not a rebalance where the ships gain complete new roles and identities. This is focused on fine tuning. I have spoken up about the fact that the situation where Titans were being bumped out of POS shields was not acceptable to me. I’ve voiced my disagreement as have other players. CCP Fozzie has posted changes to cyno usage outside of POS force fields . I am not fully happy with this change. I am happy that it will stop the Titan bumping issue. I am not happy with not being able to light cynos on shields. I feel that it will negatively affect tackling ships hugging force fields and I have expressed that. The topic came up in one of our Summit Meetings with CCP Fo