Skip to main content

The Drums of War

War Decs have been sent out. For the first time since I started playing I am not worried. I am not fretting. I'm not uncomfortable. I am also interested, for once, in the targets of the decs.

War Decs have been a touchy subject for me in Eve. I understand why so many people like meaningless decs that seem to be nothing more than a paid for hall pass to PvP in high sec. I have never cared for them. However, this time, I have interest.

Molden Heath has become home to several new, large entities. They seem to fly with each other or at least they have created social groups between themselves. The other side of the loop is full of blobs. Large fleets of people where not everyone has low security status. This makes any fight with them a matter of not only having to deal with larger fleets but also having to deal with gateguns and station guns. They will hug stations or camp stations and do their best to maneuver fights into gates because the gateguns give them an advantage. I can blame no one for this.

Enter the war declaration system. For a while, we will pay Concord to remove gate and station guns from our fights. We are what we are in size and in ability. We will take what strategic advantage is available to us. Like any other player of the game we too can use the mechanics of the game to our favor. Normally the gate and station guns are factored into what we do. But sometimes those factors change. Attempt to use the gate and station guns against us? We will remove them. 

Jump out to high security space? Sure. Until next week. Next week begins what will be, for some of us, the rise of our security status. Tactics will have to change for everyone. My game is not dictated by having a -10 for my security status. I am not a role player. I do not feel the need to give those who will bring forty ships against my fleet advantages because 'pirate'. Because someone wants me to give it to them? Because someone else wants to play 'anti-pirate' and wishes me to be their pirate?

No. We will identify ourselves as we wish. We will label ourselves as we are. The game is as much ours as it is theirs. Molden Heath is our home. These drums have already sounded across space to summon it's children home. The target rich environment is chum in the water for the sharks. Only the sharks are adaptable. They will adjust to the situation  change their tactics, and use their abilities to their advantage. Our advantage. 

At times like this, what defines a pirate? Some would say that we must have our outlaw sec status, we must endure gateguns, we must embrace what they want to have the advantage. We cannot ship up? We cannot step it up to change? Sometimes I wonder if people think that because we so cheerfully fly around in T1 cruisers and kitchen sink fleets that it is easy to forget that what we do and what we can do are different things. Or, it may be that the coordination and strategy surprises some. It is not exclusive to large scale organizations.

These are the moments where 'small gang PvP' is first in our description for a reason. Pirates we may be but pirates do not define who we are. Only we define that. What I have always loved about this group that I play with is that they do not shun tools when tools are needed. They may not be the first choice or the second. It may not be the most preferred game play or the most anticipated. But they will use what needs to be used and change and adapt as we need to change and adapt.

I was sad when 7-2 dropped war decs and we did not. The change in the fleet structure turned my participation into a liability for myself. Now, the ground is smoothing back out. My beloved fleet access has regained its flexibility.

None of this is personal. It isn't some type of fantastic vendetta upon which we have become obsessed. We're simply stepping up to the challenges before us instead of folding and running away as people seem to expect when they move into the area. The biggest negative about war decs is that other people will take them personally. Some become rather silly over the entire war target thing. That must be exhausting for them. I'm sure someone will say that this is just so that we can go to high sec and kill people and grief them so I will just say it now and that way hopefully, that check box is marked.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th