Skip to main content

Creating Culture

When I started playing Minecraft I started to ask myself why things in Eve were bad. Why was it bad to lose a ship? Why was it bad to not be the winner at PvP? Why were so many game behaviors bad? Why did I cringe at things in Eve that I snickered in or sighed in frustration about in Minecraft? I played both games in a similar fashion. I even played the games with the same people. But one often left me feeling not so good about myself while the other made me willing to share the utterly stupid things I did now and then.

Eve has cultures. It has more cultures today then it did two years ago. It has many more then it did four years ago when I started to play. However, those cultures can easily define a person. Social pressure can be shrugged off and you can be told to ignore it but that does not negate its existence or its power.

How does one create a supportive environment? It was an interesting question that I was asked yesterday. The environment in question is one that would assist other players in dipping their feet into areas of Eve that they have considered to much of a challenge. It is a question I have asked myself many times over the last year and one that I do not have an answer for as of yet.

I did point out that one of the largest and more invisable of hurdles would be the fact that people are taught that losing things in Eve is bad. Even though several learning methods promote loss, dying is bad. In our game world with its killboards that track everything people use information as a weapon. They may not have the facts. That slows few down. Making up pieces that reasonably fit into the scenerio is acceptable.

A group can form its own culture and reject others. That is commonly done. However, it takes strong leadership and commitment by its members to do so. Rejecting societal norms is hard. It becomes harder in a game where there are already assumptions as to why we play.

One of Eve's greatest fascinations for me has always been its lack of normal paths. Sucess is defined by the individual. That sounds simple enough but it is more complex then that. Sucess is not just win or lose. It is not only defined in dominating another. It is often the simple task of finding ones own game.

Making a culture is a long term commitment that requires fierce, inner support. It also requires self confidence. It requires group confidence. It is a small word for a large goal.

There are plenty of groups in Eve who have done this. Some are big. Some are small. Some are well known. Others are quiet.

What does it take for these groups to find sucess in bringing others into their definition of Eve?

Comments

  1. A really good read. I have to agree that over the years there has been many more cultures and sub cultures of players spawn with-in the game environment. This enrichment has kept me involved in the game as I know I can always turn somewhere to get involved where I want to try next.

    My own goals are easy to achieve, I am realistic with my time now as to what I can do as a player, but I am comfortable with that right now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Speaking for myself only, Eve grew deeply satisfying only when I began seriously pursuing my genuine interests. Over the years I’ve dabbled in many enjoyable things. I’ve also found that enduring interest is best generated when I don’t let the dabbles obstruct the core. Some people set goals or keep score. I, it appears, enjoy setting up a machine and then, over the months, returning to that same machine again and again tweaking, improving, streamlining, expanding. Sometimes it’s meant waving goodbye to space friends who’s primary interests were really only my dabbles. Sometimes it’s meant long curious dances with space friends whom I probably share more interests with than might be apparent. By stubbornly sticking to my core of genuine interests, navigating through these relationships has grown breezy and pleasant. I’m confident I’ll be here a year from now and equally sure of the year after that. Some of the plans I’ve made will take that long to unfold. Some of the agreements I’ve made can’t complete before that time. Eve can be a wonderfully solid place.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, I'd challenge you not to define and seek success, bit rather to seek satisfaction. Success has subtext of some sort of gain, or the opposite of loss. This is a very binary, black and white way to look at the game, even if you start putting qualifiers aroind what "success" means. EVE is a very gray universe, so I use a more gray term to define my progress.

    I can achieve very little, perhaps backstep, but still be satisfied.

    Success and satisfaction do operate together often, but not necessarily so.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The fiercely competitive aspect of EVE conflicts with a desire to be supportive to other players, and bring in new folks.

    Game communities that lack a competitive multiplayer component, such as Kerbal Space Program, are incredibly supportive.


    As to Sugar's question about specific sub-groups, I think it's self-answered ;)

    "What does it take for these groups to find sucess in bringing others into their definition of Eve? "

    A: "a long term commitment that requires fierce, inner support. It also requires self confidence. ...strong leadership [,communication] and commitment by its members to do so. "

    ReplyDelete
  5. www.youtube.com/watch?v=kED11aGobUk

    That Eve trailer is where it comes from. Not that trailer exactly, but the underlying idea. Numbers, metrics, and the like. Anything that can be measured is, taken to extremes, bad for the culture.

    Minecraft is different, the casual and abundant nature of Minecraft means numbers are ultimately meaningless. There are a few rare resources, but for the most part you can have anything you want within a couple hours of starting, and once you've got minimal infrastructure setup, a few minutes. At that point Minecraft stops being measurable in any real sense. It becomes about scope and merit of the finished product, how you got there simply doesn't matter.

    Eve though, Eve lives off numbers. Most of those numbers are completely 100% BS without any real meaning. They're the game world equivalent of GDP. GDP is a synthetic number and doesn't mean anything on it's own, you need a lot of other numbers for it to come into focus. You couldn't tell that by reading a financial page, GDP gets splashed all over articles about countries. So too with Eve. Killboards kill me, pet peeve of mine, but people compete over the things even though the numbers are synthetic and useless. But it's not just that, the complex nature of high end manufacturing means spreadsheets are a must unless you want to spend hours doing math. But a step past spreadsheets and people start thinking at the margins, that's good in real world economics, bad in actually having fun in a game. Being willing to constantly think at the margins is why rank and file stock brokers have a job, it's tedious, boring, and no one wants to do it. But in Eve will argue to the death about them like it's vitally important.

    Eve just has too many measurable numbers. And those numbers automatically make us compete and split off in factions over them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tubemate is software to watch and download videos online on Youtube very quickly and conveniently. This application is provided completely free

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th