Skip to main content

Day 3: September Summit, 2015

I should have written yesterday but I succumbed to socialization and interaction overload and went and curled up in my room instead. Anyway, no one is here to hear my struggles with being social and stressing myself over the summit.


Google photo's 'assistant' tool created a panorama from my habit of taking several shots. I hope you enjoy my view. Sion's view is an alley and he has a skylight illuminating his toilet. I'll accept my view eve with the ugly carpet and the entire steps to death thing going on.



Dawn is a beautiful time of day. It is also to damn early. I am not a lover of the morning but while I am here I try to enjoy it. However, the weather has been very, very clear and lovely. September is a nice time of year for this place.


There is a green peace boat in dock. A controversial group, I've only read about them. Seeing their ship docked was an odd experience. Also behind it you can see the clouds over the mountain. They often look like foam pouring down the mountainside.

Beyond admiring the morning, my day is as it has been. I get up at 0645. I go to breakfast. I walk to CCP's offices. I read over the minutes more and add some things. People have been very pleased with these released minutes. However, they don't tell the whole story of the discussion back and forth. They don't reflect that we run over time every single session and we've crammed a few extra in.

Steve's been giving breakdowns of how he feels in the sessions. I always feel nervous and stressed. How I feel does not reflect how the players will feel. I've learned that I have no ability to dictate what will make people happy and what will disappoint them.

The minutes are out as I write this which makes a review easier.  But let me comment on Tuesday. The Customer support session on day two session was very good. I went in with a few major points last year. One of them being a central place for policy and the other being some more directions to help players in a situation where they believe someone is suicidal. I have secondary goals like better instructions and more clarity as to the the CS process.

As for day three, the QA team was good. They have consolidated several areas that I've been chasing individuals around for. Economy news was always good. I tried to ask a few useful questions. The launcher session was solid. Structures was a continuation of what we have been talking about every day. Art is another group that has been listening to player feedback. We're working on a follow up meeting with the art director. The UI session was productive. That team has changed a lot so some of it was touching bases again and pushing him things like scaling is a problem and we need the client to be MUCH bigger then it is now. And then the Fanfest review. They have someone dedicated to planning all of that good stuff.

My evening was uninteresting. I came and holed up in my room for the night. Everyone is falling sick around me but I still feel fine. I won't trust it until I don't come down with something.

Comments

  1. Sugar,

    As a person who typically awakens around 05:30 listening to you grouse about 06:45 fills me with malevolent delight (I’m mean like that :). I also note the early hour provided some nice pictures so yah for me!

    It appears CCP is timing some devblog releases to correspond with the CSM summits which strikes me a good thing in a couple of ways . . . 1) CSM isn’t obliged to sit on NDA information quite as long and 2) the timing emphasizes/advertises how the CSM is involved in the process.

    I also note that multiple CSM members via different venues have commented that this summit has proven less reproachful and toxic than many feared. Personally, I’m not surprised. Not only does meeting face to face facilitate quickly moving from grievance to cooperation, the blunt fact that CCP, at their own expense, flies CSM members out to Reykjavík physically reveals that CCP is highly interested in player input. One can argue about how effective the CSM is (and prior to that one would have to argue about what counts as effective) but what the very presence of the institution signals is not in question. When it comes to a sandbox like New Eden, this is import stuff and it pleases me that you, the other members of the CSM and CCP put in the time and dedication to facilitate its ongoing development.

    With admiration,
    DireNecessity

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your time and commitment, Sugar

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th