Skip to main content

The Death of Asymmetry

It is odd. I, like many humans, am hard wired to like symmetrical things. When I started playing my lopsided Catalyst and the random kickstand on the Imicis drove me crazy. But, as I played, I got used to them. I never quite adapted to the Exequror engine design but it had the organically grown Gallente look. Caldari ships made a part of my brain hurt but that was also fine.

The move to symmetrical ships makes me a bit sad. On one side, they are amazingly beautiful. They also make sense. The mind does tend to love symmetry. On the other, a bit of Eve's past will vanish as well.

Kirith is overjoyed. I don't blame him. The Moa really has been a special kind of ugly.


It means I am probably randomly complaining. I like, for instance, the Tristan change a lot. I didn't care for the old hull at all. Plus, like many players, I will avoid hulls that are ugly if I can help it. My own favorite ship is a symmetrical hulll. I don't know why I'm sad about it. I don't like the asymmetrical looks.

But, I'll miss them. As awkward, weird looking, and down right ugly as they were they were unique too.

The new changes are good. They are, for the most part beautiful. Some of it is hit and miss. The Sisters of Eve battleships looks like a kitchen tool to puree food. The new pirate faction battleship looks like it needs some bacon frying on the top and the entire line should come with bumpers to stop them from cutting everything. Imagine if we had actual collision damage. They'd have bonus to hull damage as they bumped into ships.

Eve good change can be sad.

Comments

  1. I absolutely love the new models! :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So do I! I just find myself checking each one to see if it is symmetrical or not first.

      Delete
  2. Aww. :-( I'll have to rename The Ugly Duckling.

    I'm not sure what to think of the redesign. Yeah, the current Moa's ugly, but at least it's memorable. Nothing else looks that weird.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now you can call it the Beautiful Swan *sob*

      Delete
    2. If EVE ship names had strikethrough, I'd totally do that. :-)

      Delete
  3. I still miss the old Scorpion. Something about it just whispered "menace".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Should be a massive Moa hull self destruct day before the patch...put those ugly things out of their misery.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Actually, I kind of miss the old Stabber. It had that junk-yard look that's slowly fading from the Minmatar ship yards. And it kind of looked like a dead chicken.

    The new one is nice, but I don't think it captures the old spirit of the Stabber. It looks too solid. You don't get the feeling the engines will fly off if you over heat the MWD.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't think it's necessarily the Asymmetrical look that is off putting but how badly the asymmetrical design is. You can still make something look good even if it's not totally symmetrical. The problem I see is that there IS no reason for some of the asymmetry on a ton of the ships, they seem to have just been grafted goofy to make them the way they are instead of making the look feel right. (for instance the stupid flange on the dragoon, it's like a tumor and I don't know why Amarr has become so obsessed with blockish structure, isn't that a Caldari thing?)

    ReplyDelete
  7. kyle congrats on winning a csm seat!

    ix z'el

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th