Skip to main content

Deciphering Decisions


[Must Serious Post for a moment]

Like elections IRL, the CSM elections have started to ramp up before the populace was quite ready.  As I flipped through the formal notifications for some of the runners I see that they stretch all the way back to November.

The CSM is an interesting institution in Eve.  Created as a player representative group to CCP they are voted in by the players.  The entire election system has become a series of campaign platforms by people who state the reasons they wish to run and the focuses they wish the bring to CCP in hopes of players voting on them.

The player population, similar to several real life populations, are often indifferent, uninformed and uninvolved in the election.  The CSM has come and gone but as the positions have aged so have they matured.  The history of turmoil and all that good dramatic stuff I won't get into.  I've only been around for a year and I'd have to rehash rehashed history.

The point is that the CSM is an elected board that communicates with CCP.  Agree or disagree, tinfoil or not, they are represented as picked by the players to represent the players.  If there is no representive from an area it says that the players may not be as vested in that area.  Truth or not it sends a message.  

The issue with a lack of participation from the player base causes the election results become lopsided.  People complain that they have no representation.  But did they vote?  Not feeling represented is the fault of those that did not vote for the people who might have represented them.  Yes, there is a chance that the person may not be elected but at least you can bitch in complete and smug comfort knowing that you made an effort to select someone.

I'm not going to do point by point comparisons of people.  That is not where my skills lay.  For me, I'm going to find the candidate(?) that are going to have focus in the area of the game that I am interested in.  I only hope that more people will do that and make their selections.  Low Sec had one representative for CSM7.  I've enjoyed my interaction with Hans and he brought various topics forward for low sec outside of faction warfare.  I'd like that again.  I also admit, I'd like enough people to take interest in the elections for what they are supposed to mean then seeing them as some type of trolling system for the game/CCP/other players and electing dead weights that bring nothing to the table.

On the table now is Marc Scaurus as the person who has stepped up to say he wishes to represent low sec.  I find I'm uncomfortable with saying it aloud but politics are an area I find no pleasure stepping into.  Yet, I must and I must look at these things and make decisions and hope that I can be pleased with my decisions at the end.  Marc has stated some background, some future, some focus and potential promises.  I'm flipping through his history and weighing my decisions.  The lovely thing about a blogger is that they tend to stream their history behind them for perusal.

Rixx Javix has already endorsed him.  When he leaves Amok. I can make a more solid decisions.  I won't throw my full support yet, but I am hopeful.  As for the Goonswarm link, I don't care.  I know that plenty of people have their whatever for whatever.  It's not my thing. I have no love and no hate for Goonswarm.  I'm fascinated by the emotional responses that they cause in many players but I do not share them.

Will others step forward?  I don't know. I'm watching, reading, and waiting.  We will see.  The reading material can be interesting.  Some of the proposals are mind boggling.  Injecting plex into structures?  Or candidates can go to Two Step for a lesson in eloquence

Comments

  1. I've recently taken to looking back at my past blog posts and marvel at how young and stupid I once was ;) No doubt in another couple years I'll think the same of 2013 me.

    Hopefully, once I'm able to find a good landing spot for my character in lowsec (which is more of a personal decision than a ~CSM~ decision), people will begin to see past the Goon and do some research, read my words, and come to the conclusion that I have nothing but lowsec's best interests at heart. All I really want to do is listen to the community's wants and needs and represent those in an effective way to CCP.

    As always, if you or your readers have any questions, they are more than welcome to hit me up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's kind of funny. A couple of years later and now I can say, too: I've voted for Sugar. :V

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe one day!

 [15:32:10] Trig Vaulter > Sugar Kyle Nice bio - so carebear sweet - oh you have a 50m ISK bounty - so someday more grizzly  [15:32:38 ] Sugar Kyle > /emote raises an eyebrow to Trig  [15:32:40 ] Sugar Kyle > okay :)  [15:32:52 ] Sugar Kyle > maybe one day I will try PvP out When I logged in one of the first things I did was answer a question in Eve Uni Public Help. It was a random question that I knew the answer of. I have 'Sugar' as a keyword so it highlights green and catches my attention. This made me chuckle. Maybe I'll have to go and see what it is like to shoot a ship one day? I could not help but smile. Basi suggested that I put my Titan killmail in my bio and assert my badassery. I figure, naw. It was a roll of the dice that landed me that kill mail. It doesn't define me as a person. Bios are interesting. The idea of a biography is a way to personalize your account. You can learn a lot about a person by what they choose to put in their bio

Taboo Questions

Let us talk contentious things. What about high sec? When will CCP pay attention to high sec and those that cannot spend their time in dangerous space?  This is somewhat how the day started, sparked by a question from an anonymous poster. Speaking about high sec, in general, is one of the hardest things to do. The amount of emotion wrapped around the topic is staggering. There are people who want to stay in high sec and nothing will make them leave. There are people who want no one to stay in high sec and wish to cripple everything about it. There are people in between, but the two extremes are large and emotional in discussion. My belief is simple. If a player wishes to live in high sec, I do not believe that anything will make them leave that is not their own curiosity. I do not believe that we can beat people out of high sec or destroy it until they go to other areas of space. Sometimes, I think we forget that every player has the option to not log back in. We want them to log

Conflicted

Halycon said it quite well in a comment he left about the skill point trading proposal for skill point changes. He is conflicted in many different ways. So am I. Somedays, I don't want to be open minded. I do not want to see other points of view. I want to not like things and not feel good about them and it be okay. That is something that is denied me for now. I've stated my opinion about the first round of proposals to trade skills. I don't like them. That isn't good enough. I have to answer why. Others do not like it as well. I cannot escape over to their side and be unhappy with them. I am dragged away and challenged about my distaste.  Some of the people I like most think the change is good. Other's think it has little meaning. They want to know why I don't like it. When this was proposed at the CSM summit, I swiveled my chair and asked if they realized that they were undoing the basic structure that characters and game progression worked under. They said th